The American Journal of International Law, Volume 30American Society of International Law, 1936 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 22
Page 126
... judges who have taken part in the decision . Article 57 If the judgment does not represent in whole or in part the unanimous opin- ion of the judges , dissenting judges are entitled to deliver a separate opinion . Article 58 The ...
... judges who have taken part in the decision . Article 57 If the judgment does not represent in whole or in part the unanimous opin- ion of the judges , dissenting judges are entitled to deliver a separate opinion . Article 58 The ...
Page 129
... judge under Article 31 of the Statute , the full Court may sit with a number of judges exceeding the number of members of the Court fixed by the Statute . Article 5 1. The declaration to be made by every judge in accordance with Article ...
... judge under Article 31 of the Statute , the full Court may sit with a number of judges exceeding the number of members of the Court fixed by the Statute . Article 5 1. The declaration to be made by every judge in accordance with Article ...
Page 150
... judges constituting the majority . 2. Dissenting judges may , if they so desire , attach to the judgment either an exposition of their individual opinion or a statement of their dissent . Article 75 1. When the judgment has been read in ...
... judges constituting the majority . 2. Dissenting judges may , if they so desire , attach to the judgment either an exposition of their individual opinion or a statement of their dissent . Article 75 1. When the judgment has been read in ...
Contents
CONTENTS OF VOLUME THIRTY | 1 |
STATUTE OF THE COURT as amended Sept 14 1929 In force Feb 1 1936 | 115 |
Chap III | 123 |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agreed America ammunition ANDRÉ TARDIEU application appointed April 15 arbitrators Article 16 assistance Bolivia Chamber Chinese Eastern Railway Co-ordination Committee coming into force communicated Conference Council Covenant Czechoslovakia decision declaration Delegate dispute document effect election Estonia Ethiopia Ethiopian Government export Foreign Affairs France Government of Manchoukuo high contracting parties Hsinking International Labour Office Italian Government Italy Japan to Manchoukuo Japanese subjects judges judgment juristic persons KENKICHI UEDA Labour Latvia laws and ordinances League of Nations Manchuria Railway Chinese measures ment Minister for Foreign North Manchuria Railway notification obligations Office ordinances of Manchoukuo Permanent Court persons plenipotentiaries Plenipotentiary of Japan Poland present Agreement present treaty President proposal provisions Railway Chinese Eastern ratifications recognition regard Registrar request respect SEAL Secretary-General September signed sitting Soviet Socialist Republics Statute submitted thereof time-limit tion Treaty Series Union of Soviet United Kingdom vessel Walwal whales written proceedings Yugoslavia