The American Journal of International Law, Volume 59American Society of International Law, 1965 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 106
... Government does not under- take to present against a foreign government a claim which has been assigned by a foreign national to a national of the United States after the claim arose . This policy rests upon the well settled principle ...
... Government does not under- take to present against a foreign government a claim which has been assigned by a foreign national to a national of the United States after the claim arose . This policy rests upon the well settled principle ...
Page 132
... Government . In opposition to the Belgian Application , the Respondent Government has advanced four objections as being objections in respect of the competence of the Court or the ad- missibility of the claim , and as having a ...
... Government . In opposition to the Belgian Application , the Respondent Government has advanced four objections as being objections in respect of the competence of the Court or the ad- missibility of the claim , and as having a ...
Page 1009
... Government understands that the two Governments recognize that it would be in the public interest of both countries if Canada's entitlement to downstream power benefits could be disposed of , as contemplated by Article VIII of the ...
... Government understands that the two Governments recognize that it would be in the public interest of both countries if Canada's entitlement to downstream power benefits could be disposed of , as contemplated by Article VIII of the ...
Contents
July 1965 NO | 3 |
The NeoPositivist Concept of International Law Anthony A DAmato | 242 |
ASIAN AFRICAN LEGAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE Sixth Session Cairo Feb | 504 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted agreement amendment American application arbitration Article Assembly boundary Charter China Chinese claims clause Committee concerning concluded Conference considered constitutional consular officer Contracting Party Convention countries Court of Justice decision declaration diplomatic discussion disputes doctrine draft Droit economic effect established European extradition Federal force foreign GATT Government ibid immunity India International Court International Law Commission international organizations interpretation jurisdiction Ladakh law of treaties Law School Legal Adviser matter McMahon Line ment multilateral national law norms nuclear nuclear weapons objectives obligations opinion Organization of American paragraph peace Permanent Court person political practice present principle problems procedure Professor Protocol provisions question regard relations Report Republic respect rules Secretary session Shimoda sovereign sovereignty Soviet Soviet Union special mission Special Rapporteur Stat Statute Supp territory Tibet tion Treaty Series U.N. General Assembly United Kingdom United Nations United Nations Charter University