p. ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA. 6. The marginal reference to the "Charges" in the China Rules at the bottom of the page should be "Rules of Court, Form 5." p. 14. The reference to Carr v. Fracis Times & Co. in C.A. should be 82 L.T. 698. p. 28. The reference to the Laconia should be "post p. 45." p. 40. The 2nd marginal reference should be "cf. Sections VIII and XI." p. 45. There should be a marginal reference to the second paragraph: see the Note, on p. 187, dealing with a reference to this subject in the judgment in Imperial Japanese Government v. P. & O. Co. p. 55. The marginal reference to s. 5 of the Foreign Jurisdiction. Act, should be: cf. ante p. 23, post p. 82, and Section VII, 4, where the Acts are set out, and their application explained. p. 61. lines 18, 19, for "there is practically no direct legislation " read "there is very little direct legislation." p. 72. line 14, for "in section" read "in the section." p. 119. 3rd marginal note: for 36 & 37 Vict, c. 55 read 36 & 37 Vict, c. 88. The following note should also be added :— The operation of the Slave Trade Acts is considered in "Nationality," Vol. II, Chap. IV. p. 121: 1st marginal note: for 5 Geo. IV, c. 13 read 5 Geo. IV. c. 113. p. 122 last marginal note: for "unciviled" read "uncivilised." add This question is further considered in Section XV. p. 185. 3rd line: for "Revenna" read "Ravenna,” p. 193. 1st line: add marginal note "cf. pp. 12 et seq." p. 219. 21st line: to the words "treaty considerations apart" append the following note:— Curiously enough Arts. Ixi and Ixxi of the Capitulations contemplate the possibility of an Englishman turning Turk. p. 229. After the reference to Niboyet v. Niboyet in the margin, add but see the criticism of this case in Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier, referred to on p. 146. p. 236. 2nd marginal note: for 55 & 56 Vict. c. 22 read 55 & 56 Vict. c. 23. p. 254. At end of the third paragraph, delete the note of interrogation. p. 251. After the reference to Niboyet v. Niboyet in the margin, add but see the criticism of this case in Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier, referred to on p. 146. p. 268. In connexion with the abandonment of foreign jurisdiction, the Protocol to the Corean Treaty (printed in the Appendix) should be noted. It embodies an agreement that the jurisdiction shall be relinquished when, in the judgment of the British Government, the Corean laws and legal procedure shall have been modified and reformed, and the Corean Judges have attained similar legal qualifications, and a similar independent position to those of British Judges. NOTE on the decision of the Judicial Committee in Sayad v. Muhammad Yusuf-ud-Din v. R. reported in 76 L.T. p. 813 [1897]. On the eve of publication, my attention has been called to the above decision which I had unfortunately overlooked. In March 1888, the Nizam of Haidarabad granted to the British Government certain jurisdiction within the lands in his territory occupied by the Nizam's Guaranteed State Railways, and other Railways. The Governor General in Council issued a notification in the Gazette of India, to the following effect :-that in the exercise of this jurisdiction, described as "full jurisdiction," and of the powers conferred by ss. 4 and 5 of the Foreign Jurisdiction and Extradition Act, 1879, (of India), the following Acts were extended to these lands -Indian Penal Code, Regulation of the Police, Whipping Act, Cattle Trespass Act, and Code of Criminal Procedure. A Railway Magistrate was also appointed. The appellant, a subject of the Nizam, resident at Haidarabad, but not within the railway lands, was arrested on a warrant issued by the District Magistrate at Simla on the application of the Resident at Haidarabad, on a charge of abetting an attempt to bribe a person at Simla. The learned Judges of the Court below held that the effect of the notification was to extend the whole of the Civil Procedure Code to the railway lands: and that, as under the Code a warrant of arrest might be executed in any part of British India, the appellant was as liable to arrest in the railway lands as he would have been at Simla itself, |