The Southwestern Reporter, Volume 704West Publishing Company, 1986 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 172
... contends that the court had no jurisdiction to modify the decree , that the court erred in making additional special findings when the appellee had waived his right to request them , and that the court's decision was clearly erroneous ...
... contends that the court had no jurisdiction to modify the decree , that the court erred in making additional special findings when the appellee had waived his right to request them , and that the court's decision was clearly erroneous ...
Page 318
... contends that he was denied the right to a fair trial by the systematic exclu- sion of prospective jurors who were against the death penalty , from the jury determin- ing his guilt or innocence . The defendant relies on Grigsby v ...
... contends that he was denied the right to a fair trial by the systematic exclu- sion of prospective jurors who were against the death penalty , from the jury determin- ing his guilt or innocence . The defendant relies on Grigsby v ...
Page 822
... contends that exemplary dam- ages are not permissible in this case be- cause it is based upon breach of contract ... contend that there is no evidence to substantiate the gross negli- gence finding and resulting exemplary damages . The ...
... contends that exemplary dam- ages are not permissible in this case be- cause it is based upon breach of contract ... contend that there is no evidence to substantiate the gross negli- gence finding and resulting exemplary damages . The ...
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 708 |
Judges V | 715 |
Table of Cases Reported IX | 730 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
13 Dist affirmed alleged amended Appeals of Texas appellant appellant's appellee appellee's argues attorney Atty award banc burglary charge child Christi Cite as 704 claim Code constitutional contends contract conviction corporation Corpus counsel County Court of Appeals Criminal Law defendant defendant's dence denied District Court employer Erath County evidence fact failed felony filed granted ground of error guilty Harris County held Houston indictment injury instruction jury jury's KEY NUMBER SYSTEM lant lant's lesser included offense ment motion Nueces County offense officer opinion overruled party PAUL PRESSLER pellant person plaintiff plea point of error prior provides punishment reasonable record Rehearing remanded reversed reversible error RSMo Rule S.Ct sion State-Tex.App State's statute sufficient summary judgment supra Supreme Court testified testimony Tex.App Texas tion trial court erred trial judge Vernon Vernon's Ann.Texas witness Workers writ ref'd n.r.e.