Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California, Volume 109Bancroft-Whitney, 1906 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page xvi
... trial affirmed on the authority of Trezevant v . Strong Co. , 102 Cal . 47 , and Lake Shore Cattle Co. v . Modoc Land etc. Co. , 108 Cal . 261 ....... L. A. No. 27 .... Healey v . Norton . Judgment and order refusing a new trial ...
... trial affirmed on the authority of Trezevant v . Strong Co. , 102 Cal . 47 , and Lake Shore Cattle Co. v . Modoc Land etc. Co. , 108 Cal . 261 ....... L. A. No. 27 .... Healey v . Norton . Judgment and order refusing a new trial ...
Page 16
... trial , and now appeals from an order denying his motion . It would seem to be plain that , if Bemmerly was the owner of the disputed strip when defendant went into possession of it in 1879 , defendant has not been holding adversely so ...
... trial , and now appeals from an order denying his motion . It would seem to be plain that , if Bemmerly was the owner of the disputed strip when defendant went into possession of it in 1879 , defendant has not been holding adversely so ...
Page 19
California. Supreme Court. This appeal is only from the order refusing a new trial , and we cannot change the judgment to make it consistent with the findings . The judgment is , there- fore , reversed and a new trial ordered . MCFARLAND ...
California. Supreme Court. This appeal is only from the order refusing a new trial , and we cannot change the judgment to make it consistent with the findings . The judgment is , there- fore , reversed and a new trial ordered . MCFARLAND ...
Page 32
... Trial of Title to Land , sec . 443. ) The judgment is not supported by the findings , because in order to constitute the exhibits and transfers a foundation for plaintiff's ownership , it should have been alleged , proven , and found by ...
... Trial of Title to Land , sec . 443. ) The judgment is not supported by the findings , because in order to constitute the exhibits and transfers a foundation for plaintiff's ownership , it should have been alleged , proven , and found by ...
Page 40
... discussed on this appeal will not arise upon a new trial , and we will , therefore , briefly state our conclusions on such points only as appear to be necessary for the guidance of 40 FUDICKAR v . EAST RIVERSIDE I. DIST . [ 109 Cal .
... discussed on this appeal will not arise upon a new trial , and we will , therefore , briefly state our conclusions on such points only as appear to be necessary for the guidance of 40 FUDICKAR v . EAST RIVERSIDE I. DIST . [ 109 Cal .
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession affirmed agreement alleged appeal apply assignment attorney authority bank bituminous rock bonds cause of action certificate Civil Code Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitution contract conveyance conveyed corporation court of equity creditors damages debt deceased deed defendant defendant's demurrer dollars election entitled equity evidence execution facts filed Fresno County GAROUTTE granted held homestead indebtedness insolvent interest Judge judgment and order jurisdiction jury land legislature liability lien ment mort mortgage mortgagor motion notice opinion order denying owner paid parties payment person plaintiff pleading possession premises prior promissory note purchase purpose question quiet title railroad real property reason recover respondent rule San Joaquin County statute stockholders Superior Court supra surety therein thereof thereto tion trial trust Tulare County void water right wife