Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 51
Page 179
The language is as follows : In the event of any threat to the neutrality or security of the Canal , the two Parties shall consult concerning joint and individual efforts to secure respect for neutrality and security of the Canal ...
The language is as follows : In the event of any threat to the neutrality or security of the Canal , the two Parties shall consult concerning joint and individual efforts to secure respect for neutrality and security of the Canal ...
Page 267
Chief Justice Marshall distin- guished language of this type from language which operates in the present . As example of the latter , he cites a statement that the grants in question " shall be valid " and " are hereby confirmed " .
Chief Justice Marshall distin- guished language of this type from language which operates in the present . As example of the latter , he cites a statement that the grants in question " shall be valid " and " are hereby confirmed " .
Page 341
Back mane er Or I find that my constituents are shocked that such language is in there and that we have agreed to that . To me it is certainly one of the most objectionable parts of this canal treaty .
Back mane er Or I find that my constituents are shocked that such language is in there and that we have agreed to that . To me it is certainly one of the most objectionable parts of this canal treaty .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
REPRESENTATIVE STATEMENTS ON THE MAJOR THEMES | 17 |
2 Senator Robert Dole February 8 1978 | 75 |
3 Senator Harry Byrd March 6 1978 | 84 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continued costs debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operation Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent period position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama Reservation respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels Vote yield