Federal Supplement, Volume 502West Publishing Company, 1981 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 72
Page 94
... suit was filed , the Reissue patent had not yet issued and , therefore , the suit was based upon a charge of in- fringement of the Original patent . But , the defendant contends that , since the plaintiffs knew that at least one of the ...
... suit was filed , the Reissue patent had not yet issued and , therefore , the suit was based upon a charge of in- fringement of the Original patent . But , the defendant contends that , since the plaintiffs knew that at least one of the ...
Page 390
... suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , were entitled to attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 , and set a hearing on that matter . The Court was subsequently informed that the defendant Attorney General 1 would not contest the amount of ...
... suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , were entitled to attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 , and set a hearing on that matter . The Court was subsequently informed that the defendant Attorney General 1 would not contest the amount of ...
Page 1280
... suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act and a suit based on the same theory of liability against individual employees raises at the outset a troubling question ; i . e . , upon what basis can the Court exercise ...
... suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act and a suit based on the same theory of liability against individual employees raises at the outset a troubling question ; i . e . , upon what basis can the Court exercise ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
2d Cir 5th Cir administrative affidavit agent agreement alleged amended appeal application attorney award basis Beverage Board CALPAC cause of action cert Circuit Cite as 502 Civil Procedure Civil Rights claim claimant cocoa powder collateral estoppel complaint constitutional contends contract Corp corporation counsel County criminal damages decision defendant defendant's denied determination discrimination District Court District Judge due process employee employment entitled estoppel evidence F.Supp fact federal court fees fendant filed grand jury granted habeas corpus hearing held indictment injunction Iran issue jurisdiction KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed liability MEMORANDUM ment motion for summary motion to dismiss officers parties patent person petition petitioner plain plaintiff prior provides pursuant question reason received regulations relief Rule S.Ct Section Security sion statute statutory summary judgment supra TELCO testimony tiff tion Title VII trial United States District violation Whatley York