Clot. (5) To leave you in your madness, 'twere my fin. I will not. Imo. Fools cure not mad folks. Clot. Do you call me fool? Imo. As I am mad, I do : If you'll be patient, I'll no more be mad; And am fo near the lack of charity you: T'accufe myself, I hate you: which I had rather Clot. You fin against Obedience, which you owe your father; for (7) The contract you pretend with that base wretch, (5) To leave you in your madness, 'twere my fin, I will not. Imo. Fools ARE not mad folks. Clot. Do you call me fool? One, Imo. As I am mad, I do:] But does the really call him fool? The acuteft critic would be puzzled to find it out, as the text ftands. The reafoning is perplexed by a flight corruption; and we must restore it thus, Fools CURE not mad folks, You are mad, fays he, and it would be a crime in me to leave you to yourself. Nay, fays the, why fhould you ftay? A fool never cur'd madnefs. Do you call me fool? replies he, &c. All this is eafy and natural. And that cure was certainly the poet's word, I think, is very evident from what Imogen immediately fubjoins: If you'll be patient, I'll no more be mad; That cures us both. ie. if you'll ceafe to torture me with your foolish folicitations, I'll ceafe to fhew towards you any thing like madnefs; fo a double cure will be effected, of your folly, and my fuppofed frenzy. -fo verbal: -] Is, fo verbofe, fo full of talk. WARB. (6) (7) The contract, &c.] Here Shakespeare has not preferved, with his common nicety, the uniformity of character. The fpeech of Cloten is rough and harsh, but certainly not the talk of |