...vitiate n patent by prior publication, whether in a prior specification or in a published book, Ac., the antecedent statement must be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the subject would .it onco perceive, understand, and bo able practically to apply the discovery without the necessity...

...a jury. — In a question of the novelty of a patent, the antecedent statement in the prior patent must be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of...information before the invention can be made useful. — (Hills v. Evans, 31 L. J , Ch. 457.) BOTTOMRY BOND. — To render vajid a bottomry bond where communication...

...a jury. — In a question of the novelty of a patent, the antecedent statement in the prior patent must be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of...perceive, understand, and be able practically to apply the discbvery without the necessity of making further experiments and gaining further information before...

...vitiate a patent by prior publication, whether in a prior specification or in a published book, Ac., the antecedent statement must be such that a person...without the necessity of making further experiments. If anything remains to be ascertained which is necessary for the useful application of the discovery,...

...vitiate a Patent by prior publication, whether in a prior specification or in a published book, &<:., the antecedent statement must be such that a person...without the necessity of making further experiments. If anything remains to be ascertained which is necessary for the useful application of the discovery,...

...Westbury, LC, said : " The antecedent statement must (in or ier to invalidate a subsequent patent) be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the...without the necessity of making further experiments and paining further information before the invention can be made useful. . . . The information as to the...

...the attribute of novelty, must (according to Westbury, LC, in Hills v. Evans, 4 De GF & J. 288) , " be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the...information, before the invention can be made useful. If something remains to be ascertained which is necessary for the useful application of the discovery,...

...of the attribute of novelty, must (according to Westbury, LC, in Hills v. Evans, 4 De GF & J. 288) ' be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the...information, before the invention can be made useful. If something remains to be ascertained which is necessary for the useful application of the discovery,...

...subsequent discovery" (f), and "The antecedent statement must, in order to invalidate the subsequent patent, be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the subject would at once perceive, and understand, and be able practically to apply the discovery without the necessity of making further...

...attribute of novelty, must (according to Lord Westbury, C., in Hills v. Evans, 4 De GF & J. 288) ' be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the...information, before the invention can be made useful. If something remains to be ascertained which is necessary for the useful application of the discovery,...