The American Journal of International Law, Volume 30American Society of International Law, 1936 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 86
... interpretation had been undertaken to " implement " the Pact , but in the absence of any such action , interpretation must be undertaken by the signatories when claiming that there has been a breach . Without such interpretation , there ...
... interpretation had been undertaken to " implement " the Pact , but in the absence of any such action , interpretation must be undertaken by the signatories when claiming that there has been a breach . Without such interpretation , there ...
Page 406
... interpretation , but rather a reserva- tion which would afford to the United States , as in the past , full faculty of subjective and unilateral interpretation and application , which alone a clause in the form of a reservation could ...
... interpretation , but rather a reserva- tion which would afford to the United States , as in the past , full faculty of subjective and unilateral interpretation and application , which alone a clause in the form of a reservation could ...
Page 481
... interpretation which these four Secretaries of State had placed upon the treaty with Mexico , it did assert that their opinions , uniform as they were , were entitled to great weight , and appar- ently it was their interpretation more ...
... interpretation which these four Secretaries of State had placed upon the treaty with Mexico , it did assert that their opinions , uniform as they were , were entitled to great weight , and appar- ently it was their interpretation more ...
Contents
THE FOURTEENTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE | 1 |
THE TEST OF AGGRESSION IN THE ITALOETHIOPIAN WAR Quincy Wright | 57 |
THE PROCLAIMING OF TREATIES IN THE UNITED STATES Henry Reiff | 63 |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adopted advisory opinion agreement Albanian amendments American applied April arbitration Article Assembly authority belligerents Britain British citizens citizenship claims clause Commission Committee concerning concluded Conference Congress Constitution contract Convention coöperation Council Court of International Covenant Danzig decision declared denial of justice diplomatic dispute droit international effect embargo Ethiopia existing fact force France Geneva Germany gold coin Government Hague Ibid important interest International Justice international law Italian Italy JOURNAL jurisdiction League of Nations legislation Lithuania Locarno Treaty Memel Memel Territory Memellanders ment Minister Monroe Doctrine negotiations neutrality obligations Office Pact paragraph parties peace Permanent Court political President principle procedure Protocol provisions question radio ratification regard Reichstag relations Republic resolution rules sanctions Sept Series A/B Soviet stateless persons Statute territory tion Treaty of Versailles Treaty Series United Upper Silesia violation Weimar Constitution