Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 25Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 1908 - Design protection |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 37
... object of the alleged invention had been proposed in technical literature and Specifications ; and that the allegations contained in the Petition were not true . The Petitioner applied for Particulars of those allegations . The ...
... object of the alleged invention had been proposed in technical literature and Specifications ; and that the allegations contained in the Petition were not true . The Petitioner applied for Particulars of those allegations . The ...
Page 43
... object and that that com- bination was new ; that the 1901 Patent also claimed a particular new combination ; that the 1898 Patent was not void for want of utility , there being no reason , but for the advent of the 1901 Patent , why it ...
... object and that that com- bination was new ; that the 1901 Patent also claimed a particular new combination ; that the 1898 Patent was not void for want of utility , there being no reason , but for the advent of the 1901 Patent , why it ...
Page 49
... object was described . He alleged that the Plaintiff's claim included this earlier invention , and that he had insufficiently described in what the novelty of his invention consisted . The two machines differed in certain details . It ...
... object was described . He alleged that the Plaintiff's claim included this earlier invention , and that he had insufficiently described in what the novelty of his invention consisted . The two machines differed in certain details . It ...
Page 48
... object was described . He alleged that the Plaintiff's claim included this earlier invention , and that he had insufficiently described in what the novelty of his invention consisted . The two machines differed in certain details . It ...
... object was described . He alleged that the Plaintiff's claim included this earlier invention , and that he had insufficiently described in what the novelty of his invention consisted . The two machines differed in certain details . It ...
Page 72
... object of the " Legislature was to relieve traders from the necessity of disclaiming , " and I think it follows from this , that the condition is one for the " imposition of which some good reason ought to be established , " rather than ...
... object of the " Legislature was to relieve traders from the necessity of disclaiming , " and I think it follows from this , that the condition is one for the " imposition of which some good reason ought to be established , " rather than ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Aerated Bread Company agent Air Company Ld ammonia apparatus application ball brandy British Liquid Air British Oxygen Company carried Chartreuse Claim coil combination Complainers Complete Specification condensed connected construction Court of Appeal cylinder damages Defendant Company Diabolo electric Electromobile entitled evaporation evidence flues frame Frichot Goupil Gallery granted grippers gutta-percha held improvements injunction judgment Justice label Lecouturier Letters Patent liqueur Liquid Air Company Lord machine manufacture matter means Motion motive fluid nascent oxygen nitric acid nitrogen peroxide obtained Order oxidising agent Oxygen Company Ld ozone Particulars of Objections passage passing Petition Petitioner piston chamber Plaintiff Company Plaintiffs pneumatic pressure prior produced Provisional Specification purpose Pursuers question razor rectification referred registered relay Respondents restrain Roriz Section selling sold Sons Ld spindle springs Statement of Claim subject-matter substantially as described temperature Trade Mark validity valve WARRINGTON William Marchant wire word
Popular passages
Page 486 - Having now particularly described and ascertained the nature of my said invention and in what manner the same is to be performed, I declare that what I claim is (d).
Page 234 - Family, uses in connection with any trade, business, calling, or profession any device, emblem, or title in such manner as to be calculated to lead to the belief that he is employed...
Page 443 - I think, any other general answer that can be given to this question than this — that the information as to the alleged invention given by the prior publication must, for the purposes of practical utility, be equal to that given by the subsequent patent. The invention must be shown to have been before made known. Whatever, therefore, is essential to the invention, must be read out of the prior publication. If specific details are necessary for the practical working and real utility of the alleged...
Page 508 - Court, in deciding whether such trade mark shall be entered or shall remain upon the register, may require, as a condition of its being upon the register, that the proprietor shall disclaim any right to the exclusive use of any part or parts of such trade...
Page 545 - Upon the view which I take of this case, it is not necessary to decide whether or not this argument is well founded. In this judgment I use the phrase " cost of repairs " as including the cost of freeing the vessel and her cargo from the salvors...
Page 128 - A name of an individual or firm printed, impressed, or woven in some particular and distinctive manner : or A written signature or copy of a written signature of an individual or firm...
Page 509 - In an inquiry like the present, (the applicant) does not hold the same position which he would have occupied if he had been defending himself against an action for infringement. There the onus of showing that his trade mark was calculated to mislead rests, not on him, but upon the party alleging infringement; here, he...
Page 509 - It shall not be lawful to register as a trade mark or part of a trade mark any matter the use of which would, by reason of its being likely to deceive or cause confusion or otherwise, be disentitled to protection in a court of justice, or would be contrary to law or morality, or any scandalous design.
Page 2 - Where any person claiming to be the patentee of an invention, by circulars, advertisements, or otherwise, threatens any other person with any legal proceedings...
Page 509 - It shall not be lawful to register as part of or in combination with a trade mark any words the exclusive use of which would by reason of their being calculated to deceive or otherwise, be deemed disentitled to protection in a Court of justice, or any scandalous design.