The American Journal of International Law, Volume 35American Society of International Law, 1941 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 79
Page 3
... conclusion that the League had obligations in the matter , to embody proposals for a fair settlement in their report ; this committee made its report on September 12 , 1936 , and the report was adopted by the Council on September 25 ...
... conclusion that the League had obligations in the matter , to embody proposals for a fair settlement in their report ; this committee made its report on September 12 , 1936 , and the report was adopted by the Council on September 25 ...
Page 259
... conclusion as far as the customary rule of ex- propriation is concerned . 62 An outspoken recognition of the principle of the international standard is contained in the United States - Mexican Claims Commission case of George W. Hopkins ...
... conclusion as far as the customary rule of ex- propriation is concerned . 62 An outspoken recognition of the principle of the international standard is contained in the United States - Mexican Claims Commission case of George W. Hopkins ...
Page 291
... conclusion you refused to concur . This point of difference had been clearly brought out . I am sure you will recall that , after several conferences had been held , the Umpire expressed himself in agreement with me , and we both in ...
... conclusion you refused to concur . This point of difference had been clearly brought out . I am sure you will recall that , after several conferences had been held , the Umpire expressed himself in agreement with me , and we both in ...
Contents
April 1941 NO | 2 |
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL | 4 |
THE INTERAMERICAN NEUTRALITY COMMITTEE Charles G Fenwick 12 2438 | 41 |
20 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreement aliens American Republics applied April arbitration Article awards belligerent Britain British Canal Zone claim clause commercial Commission Committee Conference Congress constitutional contingent duty Convention coöperation countries decision declaration Department diplomatic dispute Droit International effect El Condado enemy expropriation fact force foreign French German Government Hague Hague Convention Havana Ibid Inter-American interest international law islands JOURNAL July June June 15 jurisdiction League of Nations legislation Majesty's Government ment most-favored-nation neutral Northport obligations Office opinion Pact Pan American Union Panama Canal parties peace Permanent Court political ports possession present President principle prisoners of war problem proclamation protection provisions Puerto Rico question ratification recognized regard regulations relations respect rule Secretary ships Smelter sovereign sovereignty statute sulphur dioxide Supp Tangier Tariff Act territory Text tion trade treaty Treaty Series Tribunal unconditional United vessels violation Washington whales