Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 61
Page 155
... Chiefs , who have followed these negotiations from the beginning . I think the Senator is aware of the fact that some of the provisions of this treaty actually were drafted in the Pentagon . They were cleared , of course , by our ...
... Chiefs , who have followed these negotiations from the beginning . I think the Senator is aware of the fact that some of the provisions of this treaty actually were drafted in the Pentagon . They were cleared , of course , by our ...
Page 172
... Chiefs of Naval Operations and fleet commander have voiced opposition to the treaties , most former Army Chiefs o Staff , as well as many retired Army officers familiar with the inheren problems of protecting the canal against internal ...
... Chiefs of Naval Operations and fleet commander have voiced opposition to the treaties , most former Army Chiefs o Staff , as well as many retired Army officers familiar with the inheren problems of protecting the canal against internal ...
Page 189
... Chiefs of Staff . I do not think anybody really should impugn the members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff because I believe they believe what they have said . As a matter of fact , some of the things that most of them have said before the ...
... Chiefs of Staff . I do not think anybody really should impugn the members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff because I believe they believe what they have said . As a matter of fact , some of the things that most of them have said before the ...
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield