Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 9
Before reporting the treaties to the Senate , the Committee of For- eign Relations held a final series of hearings in late January which featured_historians , legal scholars , transportation exports , business- ...
Before reporting the treaties to the Senate , the Committee of For- eign Relations held a final series of hearings in late January which featured_historians , legal scholars , transportation exports , business- ...
Page 17
Mr. President , first let me say I want to express my appreciation to the majority leader and to the minority leader for the very fine manner in which they have cooperated with the Committee on Foreign Relations .
Mr. President , first let me say I want to express my appreciation to the majority leader and to the minority leader for the very fine manner in which they have cooperated with the Committee on Foreign Relations .
Page 290
Mr. President , Alexander Hamilton is the author of the concurrent theory that the Foreign Relations Committee and the State Depart- ment have invoked to justify the disposal of the Panama Canal by a self - executing treaty .
Mr. President , Alexander Hamilton is the author of the concurrent theory that the Foreign Relations Committee and the State Depart- ment have invoked to justify the disposal of the Panama Canal by a self - executing treaty .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield