Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 56
Page 253
The treaty regulated commerce ; the Constitution gave that power to Congress , which included the House of Representatives ; yet the House had not been consulted . . . " ... Marshall's position was that a " treaty is as completely a ...
The treaty regulated commerce ; the Constitution gave that power to Congress , which included the House of Representatives ; yet the House had not been consulted . . . " ... Marshall's position was that a " treaty is as completely a ...
Page 279
There are presently more than a majority of the Members of the House of Representatives - 219 , to be exact - who have joined in spon- soring a resolution declaring that any transfer of property in the Panama Canal Zone must receive the ...
There are presently more than a majority of the Members of the House of Representatives - 219 , to be exact - who have joined in spon- soring a resolution declaring that any transfer of property in the Panama Canal Zone must receive the ...
Page 502
September 5 - The White House sent copies of the " Washington Dec- laration " of support of the new treaties to representatives of all countries scheduled to attend the signing of the Panama Canal treaties .
September 5 - The White House sent copies of the " Washington Dec- laration " of support of the new treaties to representatives of all countries scheduled to attend the signing of the Panama Canal treaties .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield