Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 102
More- over , further study must be given to the annexes to this executive agree- ment , to the ... but instead in this executive agreement in implementa- tion of article IV - an agreement which is several times as large as the canal ...
More- over , further study must be given to the annexes to this executive agree- ment , to the ... but instead in this executive agreement in implementa- tion of article IV - an agreement which is several times as large as the canal ...
Page 336
Knowing that if anybody is going to build one , Panama is going to have to agree , No. 1 ; I mean , no matter who else can be involved in the picture , Panama has to agree , No. 1 , to build it , and no one would have a chance that ...
Knowing that if anybody is going to build one , Panama is going to have to agree , No. 1 ; I mean , no matter who else can be involved in the picture , Panama has to agree , No. 1 , to build it , and no one would have a chance that ...
Page 341
In section 2. the United States of America and the Republic of Panama agree on the following . Here is this terrible agreement that my colleague would like to cut out . This is the Panamanian side of the quid pro quo : ( a ) No new ...
In section 2. the United States of America and the Republic of Panama agree on the following . Here is this terrible agreement that my colleague would like to cut out . This is the Panamanian side of the quid pro quo : ( a ) No new ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield