Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 57
Page 298
Is it the Senator's opinion if these treaties are ratified that the United States will build the canal without an additional and further treaty with Panama ? Mr. GRAVEL . I have had occasion to talk to Panamanians and I would never ...
Is it the Senator's opinion if these treaties are ratified that the United States will build the canal without an additional and further treaty with Panama ? Mr. GRAVEL . I have had occasion to talk to Panamanians and I would never ...
Page 326
There was a study done by the Interoceanic Commis- sion on whether and where to build another canal or a sea level canal , if it were to be done . It was a very careful study , cost a lot of money , and had very detailed recommendations ...
There was a study done by the Interoceanic Commis- sion on whether and where to build another canal or a sea level canal , if it were to be done . It was a very careful study , cost a lot of money , and had very detailed recommendations ...
Page 342
Maybe the Panamanians would be so illogical that they would not want to build a sea - level canal . When would that be ? I am having trouble right now getting enthusiasm for the canal and I hope you are all going to join me in voting ...
Maybe the Panamanians would be so illogical that they would not want to build a sea - level canal . When would that be ? I am having trouble right now getting enthusiasm for the canal and I hope you are all going to join me in voting ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield