Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 92
Page 234
Thus , it seems clear to me that the United States , if these treaties are ratified , would assume actual and contingent financial obligations of a significant magnitude . The administration has sought to downplay this aspect of the ...
Thus , it seems clear to me that the United States , if these treaties are ratified , would assume actual and contingent financial obligations of a significant magnitude . The administration has sought to downplay this aspect of the ...
Page 244
.30 per ton and fixed $ 10 million payments - Not clear what kind of priority they have in deficit year . In the event of a deficit , would Panama not be paid or would U.S. pay these treaty costs ? 3. $ 10 million surplus payment - Not ...
.30 per ton and fixed $ 10 million payments - Not clear what kind of priority they have in deficit year . In the event of a deficit , would Panama not be paid or would U.S. pay these treaty costs ? 3. $ 10 million surplus payment - Not ...
Page 289
And where there is a boundary dispute and the United States does not have clear title , Con- gress approval is not necessary because disputed lands are not neces- sarily under the jurisdiction of the United States .
And where there is a boundary dispute and the United States does not have clear title , Con- gress approval is not necessary because disputed lands are not neces- sarily under the jurisdiction of the United States .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield
Bibliographic information
| Title | Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events U.S. and Panama and their canal : the diplomatic and legal record |
| Author | Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service |
| Contributor | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 |
| Length | 560 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |