Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 62
Page 307
I wanted my colleague from Alaska to know that I have been looking into the matter of a sea - level canal versus a lock canal for many years . I have become convinced that , while we can build a sea - level canal , we do not eliminte ...
I wanted my colleague from Alaska to know that I have been looking into the matter of a sea - level canal versus a lock canal for many years . I have become convinced that , while we can build a sea - level canal , we do not eliminte ...
Page 331
When my colleague from Kansas talks about that we have to have our options or we are giving away something , it is ... If the treaties do not pass , then I think that some of my colleagues will prob- ably stand up here and say their ...
When my colleague from Kansas talks about that we have to have our options or we are giving away something , it is ... If the treaties do not pass , then I think that some of my colleagues will prob- ably stand up here and say their ...
Page 341
I might say to my colleague from Michigan that I have not reviewed that study . But the taxpayers of Michigan paid $ 22 million along with the rest of the American taxpayers for a study that did choose a route in Panama .
I might say to my colleague from Michigan that I have not reviewed that study . But the taxpayers of Michigan paid $ 22 million along with the rest of the American taxpayers for a study that did choose a route in Panama .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield