Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 195
sent to the ratification - I happen to believe that if they are going to be ratified my colleagues should be concerned about having ratified treaties which are worth while , which have unambiguous meanings for solv- ing some of these ...
sent to the ratification - I happen to believe that if they are going to be ratified my colleagues should be concerned about having ratified treaties which are worth while , which have unambiguous meanings for solv- ing some of these ...
Page 292
Does not the Senator think it is going to be a great source of concern to the Panamanians , if they accept the conclusions in these figures , that in the year 2000 they are going to have an asset that is only going to be 7 percent from ...
Does not the Senator think it is going to be a great source of concern to the Panamanians , if they accept the conclusions in these figures , that in the year 2000 they are going to have an asset that is only going to be 7 percent from ...
Page 317
Now , the Senator from Nevada can - I think it is reasonable to come in and say , " Well , I am not going to accept that projected trend line " - come up with a different figure . But the thing that he cannot refute is the factual ...
Now , the Senator from Nevada can - I think it is reasonable to come in and say , " Well , I am not going to accept that projected trend line " - come up with a different figure . But the thing that he cannot refute is the factual ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield