Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 41
Page 104
Nowhere is the United States granted permission to determine that the neutrality of the canal is endangered or has been violated , and nowhere is the United States granted the right to intervene in Panama to insure that the canal is not ...
Nowhere is the United States granted permission to determine that the neutrality of the canal is endangered or has been violated , and nowhere is the United States granted the right to intervene in Panama to insure that the canal is not ...
Page 263
He contends that where a power is ex- pressly granted by the Constitution to the Congress , it is ipso facto removed from the scope of the treaty clause . I agree with the Senator that the manner in which the Senate resolves this ...
He contends that where a power is ex- pressly granted by the Constitution to the Congress , it is ipso facto removed from the scope of the treaty clause . I agree with the Senator that the manner in which the Senate resolves this ...
Page 273
The Senator contends that no property of the United States was granted by the treaty , asserting that the Court's holding was based on a ruling of Attorney General Taney that such treaties passed no title from the United States .
The Senator contends that no property of the United States was granted by the treaty , asserting that the Court's holding was based on a ruling of Attorney General Taney that such treaties passed no title from the United States .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield
Bibliographic information
| Title | Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events U.S. and Panama and their canal : the diplomatic and legal record |
| Author | Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service |
| Contributor | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 |
| Length | 560 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |