Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 56
Page 229
... language could be clearer . If the Senator from Alabama were being subjected to a claim made under language similar to that being discussed which would be a charge against him personally , I doubt that he would agree with his own ...
... language could be clearer . If the Senator from Alabama were being subjected to a claim made under language similar to that being discussed which would be a charge against him personally , I doubt that he would agree with his own ...
Page 267
... language of this type from language which operates in the present . As example of the latter , he cites a statement that the grants in question " shall be valid " and " are hereby confirmed " . If the latter language had been used , the ...
... language of this type from language which operates in the present . As example of the latter , he cites a statement that the grants in question " shall be valid " and " are hereby confirmed " . If the latter language had been used , the ...
Page 341
... language is in there and that we have agreed to that . To me it is certainly one of the most objectionable parts of ... language from the treaty to the American people , to anybody who is listening , and let them be the judge as to how ...
... language is in there and that we have agreed to that . To me it is certainly one of the most objectionable parts of ... language from the treaty to the American people , to anybody who is listening , and let them be the judge as to how ...
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield