Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 65
Page 89
The treaties themselves are vague and ambiguous and many of the details will have to be settled in the implementing legislation that must be enacted if the treaties are ratified . This legislation would set forth crucial interpretations ...
The treaties themselves are vague and ambiguous and many of the details will have to be settled in the implementing legislation that must be enacted if the treaties are ratified . This legislation would set forth crucial interpretations ...
Page 90
I am not criticizing the point the Senator is making , but I think the record should show that we now have the implementing legislation in hand . So , to whatever extent that is relevant to our further delibera- tions , we now have it .
I am not criticizing the point the Senator is making , but I think the record should show that we now have the implementing legislation in hand . So , to whatever extent that is relevant to our further delibera- tions , we now have it .
Page 91
And the Congressional Budget Office made this statement , which is a part of the Foreign Relations Committee Report : Clearly , because the implementing legislation has not been submitted the com- plete estimate of the budget impact of ...
And the Congressional Budget Office made this statement , which is a part of the Foreign Relations Committee Report : Clearly , because the implementing legislation has not been submitted the com- plete estimate of the budget impact of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield