Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 91
Page 170
I believe we could have negotiated treaties which would have provided U.S. base rights in Panama beyond 1999 while ... The second treaty we will consider provides that the United States will not negotiate with any other nation for a sea ...
I believe we could have negotiated treaties which would have provided U.S. base rights in Panama beyond 1999 while ... The second treaty we will consider provides that the United States will not negotiate with any other nation for a sea ...
Page 331
If we remove this section in the treaty , then that means that Panama is free to negotiate immediately with any other coun- try for a sea level canal , that is , with Japan , the Common Market , the Soviet Union , or anyone ; is that ...
If we remove this section in the treaty , then that means that Panama is free to negotiate immediately with any other coun- try for a sea level canal , that is , with Japan , the Common Market , the Soviet Union , or anyone ; is that ...
Page 337
I assume we can negotiate with Panama , or we can negotiate with Columbia , or we can negotiate with Nicaragua , instead of being bound not to negotiate with those countries ? Mr. GRAVEL . Well , on my time , if we can engage in a ...
I assume we can negotiate with Panama , or we can negotiate with Columbia , or we can negotiate with Nicaragua , instead of being bound not to negotiate with those countries ? Mr. GRAVEL . Well , on my time , if we can engage in a ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield