Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 69
Page 146
... transferred to Panama . 1. The United States transferred to Panama , free of cost , the waterworks and sewerage systems of the cities of Panama and Colon . 2. Free of cost , the United States agreed to transfer to Panama all lots of ...
... transferred to Panama . 1. The United States transferred to Panama , free of cost , the waterworks and sewerage systems of the cities of Panama and Colon . 2. Free of cost , the United States agreed to transfer to Panama all lots of ...
Page 269
... transfer of property . The committee took testi- mony on this subject - the question of whether the concurrence of both Houses of Congress was required for property transfers - from several witnesses , including the Attorney General and ...
... transfer of property . The committee took testi- mony on this subject - the question of whether the concurrence of both Houses of Congress was required for property transfers - from several witnesses , including the Attorney General and ...
Page 275
... transferred was small and that the transfer was not opposed in the Senate . I am at a loss to understand what constitu- tional significance the Senator ascribes to these facts . The treaty was clearly self - executing . It clearly ...
... transferred was small and that the transfer was not opposed in the Senate . I am at a loss to understand what constitu- tional significance the Senator ascribes to these facts . The treaty was clearly self - executing . It clearly ...
Contents
1 Senator Edmund Muskie February 28 1978 | 206 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
177 | 272 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance agree agreement Allen Amendment American approval Article authority believe build BYRD Canal Zone Chiefs clear colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional consider Constitution construction continue costs course debate defense Department discussion distinguished economic effect estimates executive fact figures force foreign future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land language LAXALT legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate neutrality operating Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Record Relations Representatives Republic of Panama respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator Services ships signed staff statement talking territory tion toll transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield