Page images
PDF
EPUB

Multiplepoinding-
Competency-Double distress-Exoneration of trustees.-C, a creditor of A, son of
the deceased B, arrested in the hands of trustees under B's will a sum of money,
being legitim which was alleged to be due to A, but which A renounced after
B's death. As the beneficiaries under the will maintained that the legitim fund
was by A's renunciation set free and formed part of the residue, the trustees
raised an action of multiplepoinding and exoneration. C (who meantime had
brought an action of furthcoming) pleaded, inter alia, that, as there was no
double distress, the trustees' action was incompetent. Held (rev. Sheriff-
Substitute) that the multiplepoinding was competent. Langlands, &c. V
Langlands, &c.,

Novation. See LEASE.

[ocr errors]

Parish Council. See EXPENSES, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, POOR, PROPERTY.

Partnership

Dissolution-Difference as to winding up-Partner's application to be appointed liquidator-Sheriff-Held, in a petition by one of two partners, who had retired from his firm, to have himself appointed liquidator, that the Sheriff was not competent to deal with the matter. Weir v Weir, ... Constitution Joint adventure-Advance to builder-Liability of lender for goods.— Under an agreement between an accountant and a builder an advance was made by the accountant to the builder to enable him to erect buildings. It was provided in the agreement that interest at 10 per cent. should be paid on the loan, and that the lender should have the control of all cash matters, the paying of accounts and tradesmen's wages, and the engagement and dismissal of the men employed in the work; and that he was to get a conveyance of the subjects to be built in security of the advances. The conveyance was granted, as well as a back letter showing that it was only in security. In an action for the price of bricks supplied for the work, held that the lender-whose concern was solely to have security for his loan and interest on it, but who was not to share in any profits-was not a joint adventurer with the builder, and was not liable for the account. Springburn Brick and Quarry Co. v M‘Kean, &c., Personal Bar. See ARRESTMENT, CARRIAGE, CONTRACT, LAW AGENCY, Sale. Pledge

Loan-Proof-Parole-Possession.-Held in an action raised for delivery of a diamond ring, where the defence was that the ring was pledged for a loan, that parole was admissible to prove the whole circumstances of the case, and that the defenders were not limited to writ or oath. Niven v M'Arthur's Trustees,

Poinding. See REPARATION.

Police

Private street-Temporary levelling-Charge of private improvement expenses on lands liable-Resolution to improve not minuted-Burgh Police (Scotland) Act, 1892, secs. 365, 366.—In order to constitute private improvement expenses incurred in the temporary formation of a private street a burden on lands adjoining the street, so as to make them recoverable from a singular successor, the Town Council must formally and properly charge and impose the expenses under secs. 365 and 368, and this can only be done by minuting the resolutions and other necessary particulars in the town's minute book. Leven Magistrates v M'Arthur,

...

[ocr errors]

Burgh-Paving of common areas" Bleaching green"-Burgh Police (Scotland) Act, 1903, sec. 21.-Held, in an appeal against an order by a Town Council requiring the owners to pave a common court attached to a tenement, that where the court had been originally laid down in grass and intended for a bleaching green, but there was no evidence that it had ever been used as such, and it had for some time prior to the service of the notice been almost bare of grass, and very muddy in wet weather and unfit for use as a bleaching green, it did not fall within the exception of a bleaching green stated in the said sec. 21. City and Suburban Property Investment Co., Limited v Provost, &c., of Govan,

...

PAGE

153

233

278

299

158

163

Poor

...

...

Settlement of pauper-Local Government Board's control-Sheriff.-Circumstances in
which a pauper applied to the Local Government Board for revision of an order
by a relieving parish consigning him to its poorhouse, and, the Board having
issued contradictory adjudications on the application, the Sheriff held, in an
action between parishes for relief of advances, that he could not competently
over-rule the Board's latest adjudication. Parish Council of Stornoway v
Parish Council of Harris,
Administration-Audit of Parish Council accounts-Illegal payments-Surcharge--
Persons making payment-Local Government (Scotland) Acts, 1889, sec. 70 (5);
1894, sec. 36.-At a monthly meeting of Glasgow Parish Council certain
accounts were submitted and passed. A cheque for the total amount was
drawn in favour of the treasurer, and signed by the chairman, another parish
councillor, and the clerk. This omnibus cheque was paid into an account kept
in the name of the treasurer, and the individual accounts were paid by him to
the creditors of the Council by cheque or in cash. On the report of the auditor
of the Parish Council the Local Government Board issued a determination
surcharging certain payments included in the cheque on the persons who had
signed it, as being the persons making the payment in the sense of the Act.
Held (rev. Sheriff-Substitute) that these persons had been properly surcharged.
Hutchison v Adam, &c.,

Præpositura. See AGENCY.

Preference. See BANKRUPTCY.

Presumption. See FEE AND LIFERENT, HUSBAND AND WIFE.
Process-

[ocr errors]

...

...

Record-Adjustments written on certified copy summons and initialed by agent-Act
of Sederunt, 1839, sec. 45.-The pursuer printed the record as it appeared from the
principal copy summons and defences. The adjustments made by the pursuer at
the closing of the record had been written upon the certified copy summons and
initialed by his agent according to local practice. The First Division remitted
the case back to the Sheriff, and allowed both parties to adjust anew.
Kilcoyne v Wilson,
Citation-Party gone permanently abroad-Service at house within forty days.—In an
action of furthcoming in the Debts Recovery Court the arrestees argued that,
as the common debtor had left the country some days (less than forty) before
the original action was served upon him by hand or by post at his house, the
citation should have been edictal, and was inept as it stood. Held that this
citation was sufficient. Hart v Grant & Wylie, &c.,

See also ARRESTMENT, EXPENSES. Promise

Unilateral obligation-Rejection-Subsequent claim for fulfilment -Written offer to aliment bastard.-The mother of a bastard child received from a man a letter acknowledging that he had had connection with her such as might account for the birth of her child, and saying that he was willing to pay aliment. She had already raised an action of filiation against another man in respect of the child. After receiving the letter she continued that action, and it was decided against her. Held that she had rejected the promise of the writer of the letter, and could not maintain another action against him as being the father. Rankin v Hutchison,

Property

Common interest or servitude-Village square-Dedication to public-Subsequent conveyance by superior to Parish Council-Title of frontager to prevent changes. A square or market-place was created in a village by the superior, who, in feuing the ground surrounding it for houses, gave the feuars no express right or interest in the square. It was afterwards gifted by the superior to the Parish Council, who proposed to improve the surface for public utility. Certain of the feuars sought interdict, on the ground that the alterations would infringe their rights in a pump well, water channel, and cesspool situated in the square and used in connection with their properties for forty years. Held that the conveyance to the Parish Council was no interference with a supposed prior dedication of the square to the public; that the feuars had no title to object, except as to interference with a specific interest or

PAGE

17

172

12

186

291

Property-continued.

servitude in the square; and that, even assuming that the pursuers had
servitude rights in the things complained of, the alterations were such as not to
interfere with the reasonable enjoyment of the servitudes; and interdict
therefore refused. Scotts v Cargill Parish Council, ...

March fence-Action for half cost of repair-Necessity of application to Sheriff before
repairing.-Held incumbent on a proprietor to call his neighbouring proprietor
in a process before the judge ordinary prior to entering upon the work of
repairing a march fence, and mere notice of his intention to do the work gives
him no right to reimbursement of half the cost. Duncan v Ramsay,

Public Health-
Special lighting district-Resolution to enlarge-Appeal-Local Government (Scotland)
Act, 1894, sec. 44, sub-secs. (2) and (5)—Public Health (Scotland) Act, 1897, sec.
38.-A District Committee having resolved to enlarge an existing special
lighting district, a railway company, part of whose lands fell within the proposed
enlarged district, appealed to the Sheriff against the resolution; appeal held
competent. Glasgow & South-Western and Caledonian Railway Companies v
Renfrew Lower District Committee,

...

Water supply district formation-Expenses.-A District Committee of a County
Council formed a special water supply district, but on appeal by ratepayers
to the Sheriff consented to the appeals being sustained. Held that the
appellants were entitled to expenses, and the same were modified and decerned
for. North British Railway Co., &c. v Cupar District Committee,
Sewer-Water-closets in tenements-Order to provide-Ambiguity—Burgh Police Act,
1892, sec. 246. -A burgh local health authority by resolution approved of a
form of notice to be sent by their sanitary inspector when water-closets in
tenements were to be ordered, and such a notice was sent to the appellant,
embodying a requisition in the words of sec. 246 of the Burgh Police Act of
1892, for a sufficient number of water-closets for the separate use of each sex
of the inmates and occupiers of the said tenement," after which were added the
words "namely, one water-closet." Held, on appeal to the Sheriff, that one
closet for the separate use of each of two sexes meant two closets, and that the
notice was not ambiguous, and was otherwise unassailable. Finlay v Kilmar-
nock Town Council,

[ocr errors]

Water supply in burgh—Charge for garden tap in subjects already assessed on. —A burgh water authority having in June, 1905, passed a resolution embodying terms for the supply of water for other than domestic purposes, which resolution was not published or otherwise communicated to the public, sued for these charges in respect of a supply to a garden during the year ending in May, 1906. Held that the claim could not stand, being (1) illegal in respect the premises were already assessed on for water supply, and (2) unfounded, as there was no contract in terms of the Burgh Police Act, 1892, sec. 264. Montrose Town Council v Melvin,

...

Appeal-Order by sanitary inspector.-Held that an order by a burgh sanitary inspector, appointed by and acting for the Burgh Commissioners, is an order of the Commissioners, and may be appealed against by virtue of sec. 339 of the Burgh Police Act of 1892. Irons v Leith Sanitary Inspector,

...

"Owner" of property in burgh-Liability of owner of adjoining shop to clean common stair.-Held that the owner of a shop in a tenement, with right of access to the roof by a common stair for the purpose only of sweeping vents, was not liable for the cleansing of the common stair bounded by the walls of the shop, but affording no entry to the shop. Irons v Leith Sanitary Inspector, See also TITLE TO SUE.

Public Records

Registrar of births-Audit of accounts-Production of books showing fees-Auditor's title to sue. The statutory auditor of the accounts of a Parish Council sued the registrar of births, &c., of the parish, who had been appointed upon salary, to produce his records of fees as registrar in order to the audit, and to attend, give explanations, and sign a declaration in terms of sec. 70 (3) of the Local Government Act of 1889 and sec. 36 of the further Act of 1894. The registrar denied that he was accountable for fees, and explained that the real issue was whether

PAGE

59

181

44

121

201

206

342

342

PAGE

Public Records-continued.

he was entitled to keep the fees, which ought to be decided in another process.
Held that the auditor had a title to sue, and that the registrar was bound to
produce his record of fees to the auditor, and order granted as craved, reserving
the question of right to the fees. Kippen v Monteith,

Railway

Care of line-Light railway—Unfenced line-Obligation to slow trains for sheep on line.-Held that it was the duty of a railway company working a light railway, left unfenced by virtue of its Provisional Order, to run its trains in respect of speed not merely at the rate limited by the Order, but at a reasonably safe rate, regard being had to the configuration of the ground and the natural and customary use of the land. Morton v Caledonian Railway Co.,

See also ASSESSMENT, CARRIAGE, Deposit.

Reparation-

Conspiracy-Slander--Trade union-Trade competition.-A stonecutter in business on his own account sued the office-bearers of a masters' association of stonecutters for damages for conspiracy and slander. The conspiracy founded on was (a) raising the entrance fee of the association from £50 to £100 for the purpose of keeping the pursuer out of the association; (b) sending circulars to members of the association warning them not to trade with the pursuer under a penalty of being dealt with under the rules; (c) sending deputations to recalcitrant members to enforce the said warning and to procure assurances of obedience; and (d) laying a trap for the pursuer or for recalcitrant members to show that the pursuer was trading in competition with the members of the association, and whereby one of the said members was caught and other members were prevented from dealing with the pursuer, and his business was stopped. The slander averred was contained in the circular mentioned, which was headed "Irregular Trader," and was innuendoed to mean that the pursuer was not honest, but a shady or disreputable tradesman. Held there was no relevant ground for the action so far as founded on slander, and, after a proof, that the defenders' association was a lawful one, and with lawful objects, and that the acts done by them with reference to the pursuer were not unlawful, nor carried out in an unlawful way. Crichton v Edwards, &c.,

[ocr errors]

...

...

Personal negligence--Liability of one sportsman for injury to another-Measure of
damages. -£500 awarded to a fisherman for loss of his eyesight through his
being shot by another fisherman when both were duck shooting at night. Held
not relevant to consider the defender's means in assessing the damages.
Stephen v Buchan,
Statutory compensation or damages-Arbitration or action-Undertakers-Sub-con-
tractors-Electric Lighting Act, 1882.-A burgh, having obtained statutory
powers to lay down electric lighting mains, &c., transferred, with the consent
of the Board of Trade, these powers to A, who contracted with B to carry out
the work. C, a proprietor of house property in the burgh, having got damage
done to his property by the choking of a drain, which he alleged had been
negligently injured or unlawfully interfered with in the course of the operations,
sued A for damages. Held (1) that A was the statutory undertaker, and there-
fore liable for any damages; and (2) (rev. Sheriff-Substitute) that the suitable
remedy had been selected, the damage suffered not being the proper subject of
statutory compensation and arbitration. Stewart v North of Scotland Electric
Light and Power Co., Limited, ...

Deforcement of sheriff-officer poinding.-The holder of a decree instructed a sheriff-
officer to execute a poinding of his debtor's furniture. Certain persons produced
to the officer a document purporting to convey the furniture to them, and
objected to the poinding, threatening civil proceedings against the officer if it
were not stopped. The officer was not satisfied that the effects were theirs, but
desisted from poinding after putting one of them on oath. The creditor sued
these persons for damages, in respect of their having prevented the poinding
and carried off the effects. Held that the officer ought to have gone on with
the poinding, that the defenders had not stopped him, and' that there was no
ground for damages. M'Connell v Brew, &c.,

Negligence by arbiter-Counter claim against his fee.—Circumstances in which held that a party to an arbitration was entitled to set off against a claim by the arbiter for his fee the expenses to which the former had been put in consequence of a blunder upon the part of the arbiter. A v B,

See also CARRIAGE, DEBTS RECOVERY ACT, EXPENSES, ROAD, SHIP.

239

90

70

165

189

261

289

PAGE

Retention. See ARRESTMENT, BANKRUPTCY, Law Agency.

Road

[ocr errors]

Passage-Obstruction by temporary fence-Unopened road-Damages.-A motor car
was driven by its owner, who had lost his way on a summer evening, along a
newly finished road which, till it should be taken over by the road authority,
had been obstructed at one place by a wire fence constructed without central
posts. The car was driven against the fence, and the driver, his friend, and
the car were injured. Held, the road being open for some distance before the
fence was reached, that the driver entered the road by implied invitation, that
the fence was not so constructed as to be visible to a careful driver in the
circumstances, and that the driver and his friend were entitled to damages.
Budd, &c. v Cunningham & Sons,
Road authority-Entry on lands for material—“ Private use” of stone-Interdict.—
Where a proprietor of an estate had two quarries in the same ridge of rock, the
outer of which had been used for years by the road authority for winning road
metal, to be carried across the estate by a road, and the inner had been worked
exclusively by the proprietor till its face nearly reached his march with the
neighbouring estate, held, in the circumstances, that the rock of the inner
quarry was required wholly for the proprietor's private use, which included sale
purposes, and interdict granted against the winning of it by the road authority.
Opinion as to the using of the road and quarry as an access to the working of
road material on the neighbouring estate, and the removing of the rock to form
an access thereto. Blenkhorn v Hawick District Committee of Roxburgh,
Road authority-Transference from county to burgh-Terms of transfer-Roads and
Streets in Burghs Act, 1891.--A County Council required a small burgh to take
over the roads and lanes within it. Held that payment by the county to the
burgh of certain sums at the future date for transfer, to enable the burgh to
put the roads, streets, and lanes into good order, was a sufficient condition, the
roads being about to be brought up to standard in ordinary course by the county
before the date for separation of the management. County Council of Banffshire
v Town Council of Aberchirder,

Sale

[ocr errors]

Warranty-Horse-Condition of passing trial.—A, an intending purchaser of a horse, the owner of which, B, represented it to be sound, obtained it upon a few days' trial. When tried fairly it proved lame, and was reported by a veterinary surgeon to be suffering from serious defects. It was returned to B within the stipulated time, and rejected by him, and he sued for the price. Held that, even upon the assumption that the horse was fundamentally sound, A, having obtained a trial and having reasonable grounds for considering that the horse was unsuitable at the time of trial, was entitled to return it. M'Clelland v Lang, Delivery by instalments-Buyer's failure to take delivery-Seller's right to cancel contract.-A agreed to sell to B 1000 tons of coal, to be delivered at the rate of two trucks a day. At the time when the contract should have been fully implemented, namely, 5th August, only about one-third of the 1000 tons had been delivered, the shortage being due in part to A's default, but in greater degree to that of B, who had frequently countermanded the daily supply, and had also, on other occasions, allowed his siding to become so crowded with trucks that the railway company refused to send on any more. A continued to deliver coal after 5th August, until he had more than made up the shortage due to his default. Held that A was entitled to refuse to make any further deliveries under the contract. Johnstone & Boath v Purden & Sons, Delivery-Rejection and subsequent sale by buyers. -Held (1) that the only question under a contract for delivery of a known article of commerce (steam coal) was whether what was delivered reasonably answered the description of what was sold, not whether it suited the buyer's special requirements; (2) that goods could not be regarded as having been rejected when they were ultimately realised by the buyers without judicial authority. Brownlie & Co. v Mehren & Co., See also ARRESTMENT.

Salvage. See SHIP.

School

Obligation to provide elementary education-Child qualified for supplementary course -Board's right to select one of its schools for such.-The father of a boy, aged thirteen and qualified by examination for " 'supplementary courses," desired

100

251

269

141

196

230

« PreviousContinue »