Niagara Power Development: Hearings Before the Committee on Public Works, House of Representatives, Eighty-fourth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 142, H.R. 420, H.R. 5377, H.R. 5706, and H.R. 5878, Bills to Authorize the Construction of Certain Works of Improvement in the Niagara River for Power and Other Purposes. June 8, 9, and 10, 1955Committee Serial No. 84-7. Considers legislation to authorize FPC to issue license to the New York Power Authority to construct and operate an electric power project on the Niagara River. Also examines problems related to Canadian plans to divert Niagara River waters for power purposes. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... benefit of some introductory remarks by Mr. Dondero , who has been the author of several bills , as well as the current H. R. 420 , and who presided 2 years ago at the hearings when we had the unusual and effective procedure of both the ...
... benefit of some introductory remarks by Mr. Dondero , who has been the author of several bills , as well as the current H. R. 420 , and who presided 2 years ago at the hearings when we had the unusual and effective procedure of both the ...
Page 3
... benefit of the people as consumers , and particularly for the benefit of domestic and rural consumers , to whom it shall be made abailable at the lowest rates reasonably possible and in such manner as to encourage the widest use . ( 5 ) ...
... benefit of the people as consumers , and particularly for the benefit of domestic and rural consumers , to whom it shall be made abailable at the lowest rates reasonably possible and in such manner as to encourage the widest use . ( 5 ) ...
Page 5
... benefit of their respective peoples , equal shares of the waters of the Niagara River available for power purposes , and , Realizing that any redevelopment of the Niagara River for power in the United States of America and Canada is not ...
... benefit of their respective peoples , equal shares of the waters of the Niagara River available for power purposes , and , Realizing that any redevelopment of the Niagara River for power in the United States of America and Canada is not ...
Page 6
... benefit , of the United States ' share of the waters of the Niagara River made available by the provisions of the Treaty , and no project for redevelopment of the United States ' share of such waters shall be undertaken until it be ...
... benefit , of the United States ' share of the waters of the Niagara River made available by the provisions of the Treaty , and no project for redevelopment of the United States ' share of such waters shall be undertaken until it be ...
Page 8
... benefit , of the United States ' share of the waters of the Niagara River made available by the provisions of the treaty , and no project for redevelopment of the United States ' share of such waters shall be undertaken until it be ...
... benefit , of the United States ' share of the waters of the Niagara River made available by the provisions of the treaty , and no project for redevelopment of the United States ' share of such waters shall be undertaken until it be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional agency Alcoa America and Canada BECKER believe benefit BLATNIK Buckley bill Canadian capacity Chairman Colonel WHIPPLE committee Congress construction consumers contract Corp cost CRAMER cubic feet diversion DONDERO electric power Engineers favor Federal Government Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission feet per second GENTRY going Governor hearings hydroelectric power industry interest International Joint Commission JONES KABAT kilowatt-hour kilowatts Lawrence power legislation license MACHOLD MACHROWICZ ment MILLER million MOSES municipalities Niagara Falls Niagara Mohawk Niagara power Niagara River Ontario operation park percent plant power development power project power purposes preference private companies private enterprise private utilities proposed public development public power question RADWAN rates record redevelopment of Niagara reservation Robert Moses rural electric cooperatives scenic beauty SCHERER Senator LEHMAN statement taxes tion treaty United utility companies York Power Authority York State Power
Popular passages
Page 70 - WHEREAS the Senate of the United States by their resolution of March 3, 1909 (two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein) did advise and consent to the ratification of the said Treaty...
Page 69 - The present treaty shall be ratified by the President of the United States of America, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate thereof, and by His Britannic Majesty. The ratifications shall be exchanged at Washington as soon as possible and the treaty shall take effect on the date of the exchange of its ratifications. It shall thereafter remain in force continuously unless and until terminated by twenty-four months' written notice given by either high contracting party to the other.
Page 70 - America, have caused the said treaty and the said understanding, as forming a part thereof, to be made public, to the end that the same and every article and clause thereof may be observed and fulfilled with good faith by the United States and the citizens thereof. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington this...
Page 64 - All briefs, factums, pleadings, and documents printed for the use of the Commission must be in such form and size, with ample margin, that they can be conveniently bound together so as to make an ordinary octavo volume; and, as well as all quotations contained therein, and the covers thereof, must be printed in clear type (never smaller than pica) and on unglazed paper.
Page 63 - ... to take copies thereof; and any party not complying with such notice shall not afterwards be at liberty to put any such document in evidence on his behalf in such...
Page 66 - ... maintenance on their respective sides of the boundary of any remedial or protective works or any dams or other obstructions in waters flowing from boundary waters or in waters at a lower level than the boundary in rivers flowing across the boundary, the effect of which is to raise the natural level of waters on the other side of the boundary, unless the construction or maintenance thereof is approved by the aforesaid International Joint Commission.
Page 70 - EXCHANGE On proceeding to the exchange of the ratifications of the treaty signed at Washington on January 11, 1909, between the United States and Great Britain, relating to...
Page 49 - This policy is further declared to be that the projects herein provided for shall be considered primarily as for the benefit of the people of the section as a whole and particularly the domestic and rural consumers to whom the power can economically be made available...
Page 67 - The High Contracting Parties agree that the St. Mary and Milk Rivers and their tributaries (in the State of Montana and the Provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan) are to be treated as one stream for the purposes of irrigation and power...
Page 76 - This Treaty shall remain in force indefinitely. Either Party may terminate it one year after notice has been given to the other Party. In witness whereof the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Treaty.