The Federal Reporter, Volume 257West Publishing Company, 1919 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 14
It is sufficient that enough be taken to deceive the public in the purchase of a protected article . " In Ammon & Person v . Narragansett Dairy Co. ( D. C. ) 252 Fed . 276 , 278 , the registered trade - mark of plaintiff was “ Queen of ...
It is sufficient that enough be taken to deceive the public in the purchase of a protected article . " In Ammon & Person v . Narragansett Dairy Co. ( D. C. ) 252 Fed . 276 , 278 , the registered trade - mark of plaintiff was “ Queen of ...
Page 48
It is questioned for failing to sufficiently describe the locality where the alleged murder was committed to give a federal court jurisdiction . Jurisdiction in the federal court was claimed by the government under the following part of ...
It is questioned for failing to sufficiently describe the locality where the alleged murder was committed to give a federal court jurisdiction . Jurisdiction in the federal court was claimed by the government under the following part of ...
Page 49
St. § 1691 ) , be deemed sufficient . [ 4 ] Again , the place being sufficiently described , if the court judicially notices its character , then neither averment nor proof of it would be essential . In the case of Jones v .
St. § 1691 ) , be deemed sufficient . [ 4 ] Again , the place being sufficiently described , if the court judicially notices its character , then neither averment nor proof of it would be essential . In the case of Jones v .
Page 50
The words quoted at the outset convey with clearness sufficient for justice that the Ft . Worden military reservation was under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States at the time of the murder . ” The case of Benson v .
The words quoted at the outset convey with clearness sufficient for justice that the Ft . Worden military reservation was under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States at the time of the murder . ” The case of Benson v .
Page 57
Evidence in a prosecution for introducing liquors into a prohibition state held sufficient to justify submission of the case to the jury . In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma ; Ralph ...
Evidence in a prosecution for introducing liquors into a prohibition state held sufficient to justify submission of the case to the jury . In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma ; Ralph ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed alleged amendment amount Appeals application authority bank bankrupt bankruptcy bill cause charge Circuit Circuit Judge City claim Comp Company conclusion condition Congress Constitution construction contract corporation cotton counsel count decree defendant denied determined directed District Court District Judge duty effect error evidence fact filed follows force further given granted ground held indictment intent interest issued judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests land machine March matter means Michigan motion necessary notes operation opinion paid parties patent payment person petition plaintiff present prior proceedings purchase question railroad reason receiver record referred relation respect result rule statement statute sufficient suit sustained testimony tion topic & KEY-NUMBER trial trust United witness York
Popular passages
Page 466 - In the following rules every steam vessel which is under sail and not under steam is to be considered a sailing vessel, and every vessel under steam, whether under sail or not, is to be considered a steam vessel. The words " steam vessel" shall include any vessel propelled by machinery. A vessel is
Page 62 - The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
Page 803 - And when in any suit mentioned in this section there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different states, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the defendants actually interested in such controversy may remove said suit into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district.
Page 384 - On the hearing of any appeal, certiorari, writ of error, or motion for a new trial, in any case, civil or criminal, the court shall give judgment after an examination of the entire record before the court, without regard to technical errors, defects, or exceptions which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
Page 332 - ... when the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.
Page 202 - All sutlers and retainers to the camp, and all persons whatsoever, serving with the armies of the United States in the field, though not enlisted soldiers, are to be subject to orders, according to the rules and discipline of war.
Page 570 - Of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases the right of a common-law remedy where the common law is competent to give it, and to claimants the rights and remedies under the workmen's compensation law of any State...
Page 115 - President forthwith to demand of that government the reasons for such imprisonment, and if it appears to be wrongful and in violation of the rights of American citizenship, the President shall forthwith demand the release of such citizen, and if the release so demanded is unreasonably delayed or refused, it shall be the duty of the President to use such means, not amounting to acts of war, as he may think necessary and proper...
Page 703 - ... if any change other than by the death of an insured, take place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard) whether by legal process or judgment or by voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise...
Page 258 - ... it shall be unlawful for any person,' persons, or corporation to offer, grant, or give or to| solicit, accept, or receive any rebate, concession, or discrimination in respect of the transportation of any property in interstate or foreign commerce by any common carrier...