Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 14Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 1897 - Design protection |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 83
Page xxi
... ROMER , J. WILCOX AND GIBBS SEWING MACHINE CO . v . JANES BROTHERS , p . 524 . CERTIFICATE OF VALIDITY OF PATENT QUESTION . HAVING COME IN 1. Certificate granted . ADAMANT STONE AND PAVING CO . , LD . v . THE CORPORATION OF LIVERPOOL ...
... ROMER , J. WILCOX AND GIBBS SEWING MACHINE CO . v . JANES BROTHERS , p . 524 . CERTIFICATE OF VALIDITY OF PATENT QUESTION . HAVING COME IN 1. Certificate granted . ADAMANT STONE AND PAVING CO . , LD . v . THE CORPORATION OF LIVERPOOL ...
Page 4
... Romer , J. , who held that both Claims 1 and 2 were anticipated ( see 12 R.P.C. 65 ) . The Respondents appealed , and the Court of Appeal , in April 1895 , affirmed the decision as to Claim 1 , 10 but held that Claim 2 was valid ( see ...
... Romer , J. , who held that both Claims 1 and 2 were anticipated ( see 12 R.P.C. 65 ) . The Respondents appealed , and the Court of Appeal , in April 1895 , affirmed the decision as to Claim 1 , 10 but held that Claim 2 was valid ( see ...
Page 11
... ROMER . November 6th , 7th , 9th , 10th , and 30th , 1896 . ADAMANT STONE AND PAVING COMPANY , LD . v . THE CORPORATION OF LIVERPOOL . Patent . - Action for infringement of two patents . - Subject - matter . - Alleged anticipation ...
... ROMER . November 6th , 7th , 9th , 10th , and 30th , 1896 . ADAMANT STONE AND PAVING COMPANY , LD . v . THE CORPORATION OF LIVERPOOL . Patent . - Action for infringement of two patents . - Subject - matter . - Alleged anticipation ...
Page 16
... [ ROMER , J. - How did the general knowledge stand as to making slabs from slip ? ] Skinner and Whalley give the identical process , and McLean's 10 patent of 1882 was identical in getting slabs by pressure ; there was not , in the 1882 ...
... [ ROMER , J. - How did the general knowledge stand as to making slabs from slip ? ] Skinner and Whalley give the identical process , and McLean's 10 patent of 1882 was identical in getting slabs by pressure ; there was not , in the 1882 ...
Page 17
... [ ROMER , J. - It would be 10 expensive . Wallace , Q.C. - It would be impracticable . ] The Defendants use calico over the perforated zinc , and felt under that , therefore all the material retained from slipping away is turned back by ...
... [ ROMER , J. - It would be 10 expensive . Wallace , Q.C. - It would be impracticable . ] The Defendants use calico over the perforated zinc , and felt under that , therefore all the material retained from slipping away is turned back by ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action for infringement alleged invention American Syrup angle angle of repose Anilin anticipation apparatus application Baking Powder base framing Basle Bindschedler boss Bousfield brake Brooks celluloid claim coal Complete Specification construction costs Defendant Company described Dugald Clerk Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre dusters Easom and Mills electricity meters entitled evidence eyelet Figure flange granted grooves guncotton held Hookham improvements injunction Johnson judgment KEKEWICH Köttgen lamp Lamplugh Letters Patent license Lord machine magnets Magnolia Metal manufacture material means metal rim meter motion Moulton nitroglycerine otter boards Particulars of Objections Plaintiffs plates Pneumatic Tyre Company pole pieces Provisional Specification purpose question reference registered restrain retort ROMER ropes rubber tyres saddle screw Section selling sieve sold Statement of Claim strainer subject-matter Syrup of Figs thing tilt Trade Mark trawl tube validity washers Welch wires witness word Yorkshire Relish
Popular passages
Page 284 - Having now particularly described and ascertained the nature of my said invention and in what manner the same is to be performed, I declare that what I claim is (d).
Page 266 - An invented word or invented words; or (e) A word or words having no reference to the character or quality of the goods, and not being a geographical name.
Page 319 - I think, any other general answer that can be given to this question than this: that the information as to the alleged invention given by the prior publication must, for the purposes of practical utility, be equal to that given by the subsequent patent. The invention must be shown to have been before made known. Whatever, therefore, is essential to the invention must be read out of the prior publication. If specific details are necessary for the practical working and real utility of the alleged invention,...
Page 494 - A word or words having no direct reference to the character or quality of the goods, and not being according to its ordinary signification a geographical name or a surname; 5.
Page 339 - ... the person making such threats : Provided that this section shall not apply if the person making such threats, with due diligence, commences and prosecutes an action for infringement of his patent.
Page 276 - Conrt thinks fit ; Or the Court may refuse the application ; and in either case may make such order with respect to the costs of the proceedings as the Court thinks fit.
Page 338 - ... any alleged manufacture, use, sale, or purchase of the invention, any person or persons aggrieved thereby may bring an action against him, and may obtain an injunction against the continuance of such threats, and may recover such damage (if any) as...
Page 45 - ... must state in his application the essential particulars of the trade mark, and must disclaim in his application any right to the exclusive use of the added matter, and a copy of the statement and disclaimer shall be entered on the register.
Page 271 - A trade mark, when registered, shall be assigned and transmitted only in connection with the goodwill of the business concerned in the particular goods or classes of goods for which it has been registered, and shall be determinable with that goodwill.
Page 276 - The provisions of this Act conferring a special jurisdiction on the court as defined by this Act, shall not, except so far as the jurisdiction extends, affect the jurisdiction of any court in Scotland or Ireland in any proceedings relating to patents or to designs or to trade marks ; and with reference to any such proceedings in Scotland, the term