The United States Patents Quarterly, Volume 130Associated Industry Publications, 1962 - Copyright |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 74
... Board and the plaintiff both take the position that the New York State court decision is for all intents and purposes controlling . The Board interpreted the decision to accord the defendant the right to ex- clude the plaintiff from the ...
... Board and the plaintiff both take the position that the New York State court decision is for all intents and purposes controlling . The Board interpreted the decision to accord the defendant the right to ex- clude the plaintiff from the ...
Page 401
The board's holding that Daley cannot make the count must be reversed . [ 4 ] There remains for consideration the other ground of the board's award of " priority " to Wiltshire , derivation of the invention from him by Daley . To keep ...
The board's holding that Daley cannot make the count must be reversed . [ 4 ] There remains for consideration the other ground of the board's award of " priority " to Wiltshire , derivation of the invention from him by Daley . To keep ...
Page 527
... Board's decision , and a search of rec- ords would have disclosed that fact to plaintiff ; action is dismissed on ... Board of Appeals means that district court is entitled to a decision of Board on the merits of those particular claims ...
... Board's decision , and a search of rec- ords would have disclosed that fact to plaintiff ; action is dismissed on ... Board of Appeals means that district court is entitled to a decision of Board on the merits of those particular claims ...
Contents
Nutrilite Products Inc Acerola | 2 |
Nyscoseal Inc v Parke Davis | 24 |
Counter Co v | 44 |
Copyright | |
37 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1961 TRADEMARKS action advertising affirmed Alka-Seltzer alleged amendment Annapolis group Appeal Board applicant's application cancellation CCPA Circuit cited claims Company complaint compounds Corp Corporation decision defendant defendant's device disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court doctrine of equivalents Dunhill elements entitled estoppel evidence examiner F.Supp fendant filed Identity and similarity-How injunction invalid invention issued Judge judgment jurisdiction Lanham Act likelihood of confusion machine manufacture mark means ment Miles Laboratories motion operation opinion opposer opposer's parties patent in suit patent infringement Patent Office petition plaintiff plaintiff's patent plate Principal Register prior art purchasers question record reference registration rejection Rule Section 2(d Serial similar similarity-How deter sold Sonotone specification statute substantially summary judgment supra thereof thermoplastic tion trade trademark Trademark Trial Trial and Appeal tube unfair competition United USPQ utility validity Walgreen Co word York