Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

B

HARVARD COLLEGE LIBRARY

FROM THE LIBRARY OF

JOHN CHIPMAN GRAY
JULY 12, 1933

BOSTON:

PRINTED BY FREEMAN AND BOLLES,
DEVONSHIRE STREET.

MICROFILMED
AT HARVARD

THE Historical Society holds not itself "responsible for every thing," which appears in its COLLECTIONS. If any representation is not supported by good authorities, it is open to temperate discussion. Personal satire is here inadmissible. It is requisite that he, who combats any real or supposed error, give his reasons, or authorities, dispassionately; and thus prove that he is contending, not for victory, but for truth. This is the only becoming contest in the republic of letters. Quid verum atque decens curo et rogo, et omnis in hoc sum. The anonymous writer of the following article will, hence, perceive why some of his remarks are suppressed.

it

REMARKS ON "A HISTORY OF SALEM."

THE learning, the respectability, the known merits of the Historical Society, awe an individual, and command respect to what is published under their sanction. Yet as may be doubtful whether they feel responsible for every thing, which particular members, or correspondents, may communicate, it becomes a duty to point out any exceptionable passages in their publications. If this be not done, the weight of their influence may tend to give authority to error and pervert public opinion.

This, we hope, will apologize for a few remarks on “A History of Salem," published by the Historical Society. Passing over several other things, the character given of Mr. Roger Williams particularly provokes examination. The portrait of him, drawn in this history, is so unlike that, left by his contemporaries and acquaintance, that were it not for the name, no mortal would imagine it designed for the same person. If the learned historian have any authorities for what he asserts, it would have been kind in him, and satisfactory to his readers, had he admitted them to see the new discovery for themselves. No authority is quoted. But in page 246 he says, though "Mr. Williams blamed the administration, he did not oppose

it."

(iv)

In the same page he says, he "could be persuaded, but not compelled, to renounce his opinions." In page 249 he says, that," In Salem every person loved Mr. Williams; that he had no personal enemies under any pretence." In page 245 he says, that Mr. Williams, "throughout all his life, supported a high place in their affections, as a truly godly man." Again he says, that "kind treatment could win him; that he always had address enough, with his firmness, never to be forsaken by the friends he had ever gained; that he breathed the purest devotion."

We will make no reflections, but appeal to several writers, who lived nearer the scene of action; some of whom saw this comet blazing in his eccentric orb. One of them, Morton, informs us that "Williams refused the oath of fidelity himself, and taught others so to do: that he also spake dangerous words against the patent, which was the foundation of the government."

Mather tells us, that this "hot-headed man publicly and furiously preached against the patent; " that "he violently withstood the oath of fidelity." I might quote from Governor Winthrop, Hutchinson, and Hubbard, to prove the same fact. Was not here opposition to the administration, as powerful as he could make?

Equally violent was his opposition to church adininistration. Morton says, that he procured the church of Salem's consent unto letters of admonition, which were written and sent by him in their name to the churches of Boston, Charlestown, and Newtown." What Pontiff at Rome would have done more?

The same author informs us that Williams, "growing more violent, immured in his own house, sent a letter to his church, which was read in public, threatening that if they would not separate not only from the churches of Old England, but from the churches of New-England too, he would separate from them." The church did not comply with such a mad proposal, and therefore he did separate from them, and set up a meeting in "his own house, to which divers of the weaker sort repaired." Thus was he forsaken; yet the present historian asserts, "that he always had address enough-never to be forsaken by the

« PreviousContinue »