The American Journal of International Law, Volume 29American Society of International Law, 1935 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 391
... accepted , and , in case an impartial commission has been dispatched to the spot , whether it is being observed . But has the armistice been proposed in accordance with a pro- cedure which the assumed aggressor has accepted to implement ...
... accepted , and , in case an impartial commission has been dispatched to the spot , whether it is being observed . But has the armistice been proposed in accordance with a pro- cedure which the assumed aggressor has accepted to implement ...
Page 495
... accepted for Federal jurisdictions in Hilton v . Guyot . But this the Restatement definitely rejected , just as it had already been rejected by the highest courts of some of our states . The Restatement accepted the principle ( §6 ) ...
... accepted for Federal jurisdictions in Hilton v . Guyot . But this the Restatement definitely rejected , just as it had already been rejected by the highest courts of some of our states . The Restatement accepted the principle ( §6 ) ...
Page 575
... accepted it she waived that privilege . International law , it might certainly be argued , does not yet consider a treaty of peace any the less legally binding because it was necessarily accepted by the defeated Powers in preference to ...
... accepted it she waived that privilege . International law , it might certainly be argued , does not yet consider a treaty of peace any the less legally binding because it was necessarily accepted by the defeated Powers in preference to ...
Contents
THE THIRTEENTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE | 1 |
CODIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Philip Marshall Brown | 25 |
CONDITIONS OF WITHDRAWAL FROM THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS Josephine J Burns | 40 |
22 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aggression agreement alien American applied April arbitration Article Assembly belligerent Bolivia Britain British citizen citizenship claims clause Commission Committee conclusion Conference Congress Const Constitution convention coöperation Council Court of International Covenant decision declaration diplomatic dispute doctrine Droit International effect Estonia fact force foreign France French Geneva Germany Government Ibid Index interest International Justice international law JOURNAL July June June 13 jurisdiction jus sanguinis jus soli Latvia law of nations League of Nations legislation Lithuania marriage ment Monroe Doctrine nature negotiations neutral obligations opinion Pact Paraguay Paris peace Permanent Court Pigeon River piracy political President Prince principle Protocol provisions question Ratification deposited regard relations Republic resolution rule Russia Senate Sept ship sovereignty Soviet Soviet Union statute territory tion trade Treaty of Versailles Treaty Series Union United vessels violation Walwal