Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 15-25Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2006 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 52
Page 505
... allowed to continue . The respondent was allowed until March 1 , 2005 to request a hearing and , by letter dated February 21 , 2005 , it did so . That hearing took place on April 28 , 2005. The hearing officer decided to reverse the ...
... allowed to continue . The respondent was allowed until March 1 , 2005 to request a hearing and , by letter dated February 21 , 2005 , it did so . That hearing took place on April 28 , 2005. The hearing officer decided to reverse the ...
Page 611
... allowed . The hearing officer allowed the amendments . He held that he was not required to apply the criteria set out in CPR r.17.4 but had a discretion to allow the amendments . He exercised his discretion in favour of allowing them ...
... allowed . The hearing officer allowed the amendments . He held that he was not required to apply the criteria set out in CPR r.17.4 but had a discretion to allow the amendments . He exercised his discretion in favour of allowing them ...
Page 622
... allowed . Moreover , if a claim were made within the two year time limit , and an amendment were sought to be made within the same two year period it would be pointless , and productive of greater expense , to require a separate claim ...
... allowed . Moreover , if a claim were made within the two year time limit , and an amendment were sought to be made within the same two year period it would be pointless , and productive of greater expense , to require a separate claim ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AJIT alleged amendment applicant's APPLICATION 2006 application for revocation Appointed Person brand bubbles cause of action cigars claim to proprietorship claimant comparative advertising Comparative Advertising Directive Comptroller computer configuration Consignment copyright infringement counterfeit counterstatement Court of Appeal database decision defendant DESIGN AND TRADE design right disclosure discretion DocDel drug-eluting stent easyjet effect entitlement estoppel European Patent evidence exclusion failure to file field computer file form TM8 GloMop habanos Halliburton Energy Services hearing officer Hobbs invalidity invention judgment Marks Act 1994 mobile computers Mowser Navitaire non-use OHIM opposition proceedings paclitaxel party patent examination Patent Office Patents Act 1977 Patents County Court Patents Court Proxy-Server Pt Ct question reference registered design registered proprietor registered trade mark registrar relation relevant restenosis specification stent Sweet & Maxwell taxol TRADE MARK 2006 United Kingdom unregistered design right validity witness statement