Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 15-25Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2006 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 89
Page 622
... effect of an amendment . If the effect of an amendment would be to defeat a defence based on limitation , that may be a powerful factor militating against amendment . If , on the other hand , it would not have that effect , then the ...
... effect of an amendment . If the effect of an amendment would be to defeat a defence based on limitation , that may be a powerful factor militating against amendment . If , on the other hand , it would not have that effect , then the ...
Page 626
... effect ( and are declared by the Act itself to give effect ) to Art.23 do not permit new claims to be raised out of time . They are not , therefore , limitation periods to which CPR 17.4 ( 1 ) ( b ) ( iii ) applies . There is nothing in ...
... effect ( and are declared by the Act itself to give effect ) to Art.23 do not permit new claims to be raised out of time . They are not , therefore , limitation periods to which CPR 17.4 ( 1 ) ( b ) ( iii ) applies . There is nothing in ...
Page 855
... effect . Accordingly the mark is laudatory and not distinctive . Further if the products do not produce such an effect the public will be deceived as to the purpose of the product . For these reasons registration would be contrary to s ...
... effect . Accordingly the mark is laudatory and not distinctive . Further if the products do not produce such an effect the public will be deceived as to the purpose of the product . For these reasons registration would be contrary to s ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AJIT alleged amendment applicant's APPLICATION 2006 application for revocation Appointed Person brand bubbles cause of action cigars claim to proprietorship claimant comparative advertising Comparative Advertising Directive Comptroller computer configuration Consignment copyright infringement counterfeit counterstatement Court of Appeal database decision defendant DESIGN AND TRADE design right disclosure discretion DocDel drug-eluting stent easyjet effect entitlement estoppel European Patent evidence exclusion failure to file field computer file form TM8 GloMop habanos Halliburton Energy Services hearing officer Hobbs invalidity invention judgment Marks Act 1994 mobile computers Mowser Navitaire non-use OHIM opposition proceedings paclitaxel party patent examination Patent Office Patents Act 1977 Patents County Court Patents Court Proxy-Server Pt Ct question reference registered design registered proprietor registered trade mark registrar relation relevant restenosis specification stent Sweet & Maxwell taxol TRADE MARK 2006 United Kingdom unregistered design right validity witness statement