Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 15-25Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2006 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 93
Page 504
... evidence he may consider necessary to adduce in support of the grounds on which the application was made . ( 2 ) Where the applicant files no evidence under paragraph ( 1 ) , the registrar shall notify the proprietor that no evidence ...
... evidence he may consider necessary to adduce in support of the grounds on which the application was made . ( 2 ) Where the applicant files no evidence under paragraph ( 1 ) , the registrar shall notify the proprietor that no evidence ...
Page 766
... evidence ; Infringement ; Survey evidence ; Trade marks Trade mark - Infringement - Survey evidence - Whether evidence from market researcher expert evidence - Admissibility . Civil Procedure Rules , Pt 35 On the first day of a trial ...
... evidence ; Infringement ; Survey evidence ; Trade marks Trade mark - Infringement - Survey evidence - Whether evidence from market researcher expert evidence - Admissibility . Civil Procedure Rules , Pt 35 On the first day of a trial ...
Page 768
... evidence at 232 and following . Hobhouse J. analysed the evidence in this way at 233 : " First , evidence is adduced which can be described as direct factual evidence which bears directly on the facts of the case . Second , there is ...
... evidence at 232 and following . Hobhouse J. analysed the evidence in this way at 233 : " First , evidence is adduced which can be described as direct factual evidence which bears directly on the facts of the case . Second , there is ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AJIT alleged amendment applicant's APPLICATION 2006 application for revocation Appointed Person brand bubbles cause of action cigars claim to proprietorship claimant comparative advertising Comparative Advertising Directive Comptroller computer configuration Consignment copyright infringement counterfeit counterstatement Court of Appeal database decision defendant DESIGN AND TRADE design right disclosure discretion DocDel drug-eluting stent easyjet effect entitlement estoppel European Patent evidence exclusion failure to file field computer file form TM8 GloMop habanos Halliburton Energy Services hearing officer Hobbs invalidity invention judgment Marks Act 1994 mobile computers Mowser Navitaire non-use OHIM opposition proceedings paclitaxel party patent examination Patent Office Patents Act 1977 Patents County Court Patents Court Proxy-Server Pt Ct question reference registered design registered proprietor registered trade mark registrar relation relevant restenosis specification stent Sweet & Maxwell taxol TRADE MARK 2006 United Kingdom unregistered design right validity witness statement