Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 15-25Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2006 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 89
Page 624
... example , Liff v Peasley [ 1980 ] 1 WLR 781 , per Stephenson LJ , at p 791C , and per Brandon LJ , at p 799B . The reason for this rule of practice was explained by the House of Lords in Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd [ 1987 ] AC 189 ...
... example , Liff v Peasley [ 1980 ] 1 WLR 781 , per Stephenson LJ , at p 791C , and per Brandon LJ , at p 799B . The reason for this rule of practice was explained by the House of Lords in Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd [ 1987 ] AC 189 ...
Page 675
... Example 2 describes the CAM assay and the employment of that assay in assessing taxol . The conclusion in relation to taxol is that it clearly inhibits angiogenesis by arresting endothelial cells in mitosis . Example 7 describes the use ...
... Example 2 describes the CAM assay and the employment of that assay in assessing taxol . The conclusion in relation to taxol is that it clearly inhibits angiogenesis by arresting endothelial cells in mitosis . Example 7 describes the use ...
Page 782
... example , it is decorative , or has an additional function not falling within the provision . This additional function does not exclude the operation of the provision . " Mr Arnold quarrelled with none of these . He relied on Parker v ...
... example , it is decorative , or has an additional function not falling within the provision . This additional function does not exclude the operation of the provision . " Mr Arnold quarrelled with none of these . He relied on Parker v ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AJIT alleged amendment applicant's APPLICATION 2006 application for revocation Appointed Person brand bubbles cause of action cigars claim to proprietorship claimant comparative advertising Comparative Advertising Directive Comptroller computer configuration Consignment copyright infringement counterfeit counterstatement Court of Appeal database decision defendant DESIGN AND TRADE design right disclosure discretion DocDel drug-eluting stent easyjet effect entitlement estoppel European Patent evidence exclusion failure to file field computer file form TM8 GloMop habanos Halliburton Energy Services hearing officer Hobbs invalidity invention judgment Marks Act 1994 mobile computers Mowser Navitaire non-use OHIM opposition proceedings paclitaxel party patent examination Patent Office Patents Act 1977 Patents County Court Patents Court Proxy-Server Pt Ct question reference registered design registered proprietor registered trade mark registrar relation relevant restenosis specification stent Sweet & Maxwell taxol TRADE MARK 2006 United Kingdom unregistered design right validity witness statement