Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 15-25Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2006 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 91
Page 513
... rules in two paragraphs in her decision , paras 23 and 27. In para.23 she said this : " If the proprietor chooses to file evidence , the combined provisions of section 69 and rule 55 requires that evidence to be filed in the form of an ...
... rules in two paragraphs in her decision , paras 23 and 27. In para.23 she said this : " If the proprietor chooses to file evidence , the combined provisions of section 69 and rule 55 requires that evidence to be filed in the form of an ...
Page 515
... Rule 31 ( 3 ) , unlike r.31 ( 2 ) of the old rules , does not in terms limit the registrar to serving the counterstatement and evidence on the applicant only in cases in which they are served in time . Rule 31 ( 6 ) of the current rules ...
... Rule 31 ( 3 ) , unlike r.31 ( 2 ) of the old rules , does not in terms limit the registrar to serving the counterstatement and evidence on the applicant only in cases in which they are served in time . Rule 31 ( 6 ) of the current rules ...
Page 615
14 15 16 The Patents Rules The Patents Rules 1995 were made under the rule making power contained in s . 123 of the Act . There are only two relevant rules , for present purposes . Rule 54 deals with a reference to the Comptroller under ...
14 15 16 The Patents Rules The Patents Rules 1995 were made under the rule making power contained in s . 123 of the Act . There are only two relevant rules , for present purposes . Rule 54 deals with a reference to the Comptroller under ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AJIT alleged amendment applicant's APPLICATION 2006 application for revocation Appointed Person brand bubbles cause of action cigars claim to proprietorship claimant comparative advertising Comparative Advertising Directive Comptroller computer configuration Consignment copyright infringement counterfeit counterstatement Court of Appeal database decision defendant DESIGN AND TRADE design right disclosure discretion DocDel drug-eluting stent easyjet effect entitlement estoppel European Patent evidence exclusion failure to file field computer file form TM8 GloMop habanos Halliburton Energy Services hearing officer Hobbs invalidity invention judgment Marks Act 1994 mobile computers Mowser Navitaire non-use OHIM opposition proceedings paclitaxel party patent examination Patent Office Patents Act 1977 Patents County Court Patents Court Proxy-Server Pt Ct question reference registered design registered proprietor registered trade mark registrar relation relevant restenosis specification stent Sweet & Maxwell taxol TRADE MARK 2006 United Kingdom unregistered design right validity witness statement