 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1869 - 972 pages
...Justice Willes delivered the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber in this case, and observed as follows : " The general rule is, that the master is answerable...agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - Law reports, digests, etc - 1867 - 468 pages
...his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master...agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. (3) That principle... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey - Parties to actions - 1870 - 582 pages
...his master's benefit, no sensible distiuctlon can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is that the master...as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved ... In all ^the]... | |
 | India - Contracts - 1878 - 710 pages
...his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master...agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - Sales - 1874 - 238 pages
...master's benefit, no serviceable distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule, is that the master...agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the matter be proved : (Laugher v.... | |
 | Herbert Broom - Legal maxims - 1874 - 880 pages
...sensible distinction," it has been observed,5 " can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master...as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master can be proved." Ill Fuller... | |
 | Francis Wharton - Negligence - 1874 - 960 pages
...237 ; Storey B. Ashton, LR 4 QB 476. § 161. Thus it has been judicially declared in England,1 that "the general rule is, that the master is answerable...agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - Torts - 1876 - 762 pages
...the fraud was committed by the agent in the transaction of the ordinary business of the principal. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...as is committed in the' course of the service, and for the master's or principal's benefit, though no express command or privity by the master or principal... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - Torts - 1876 - 996 pages
...Can. Rail. Co. v. Conybeare, ' 22 Law J- Q- B- 69- <""'<•• See Wilson v. Kankin, LR, I 438 eral rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's or principal's benefit, though no express command or privity by the master or principal... | |
| |
The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. 
