The American Journal of International Law, Volume 42James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1948 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 75
Page 406
How could the law , first explicitly accepted in the that international law was “ law ” and others held that it was only law in so far as the sovereign states ( whom it was assumed alone had power to enforce rules and thus to make them ...
How could the law , first explicitly accepted in the that international law was “ law ” and others held that it was only law in so far as the sovereign states ( whom it was assumed alone had power to enforce rules and thus to make them ...
Page 519
No man , whatever his genius , can now hope to write a book upon the law of nations which will be accepted as setting an agreed standard of conduct for the rulers of our present world . For the present , at least , there is no common ...
No man , whatever his genius , can now hope to write a book upon the law of nations which will be accepted as setting an agreed standard of conduct for the rulers of our present world . For the present , at least , there is no common ...
Page 660
The government of Mexico questioned whether the obligations contained in the first half of paragraph 3 of Article 92 of the Draft Charter would not conflict with the obligations of a government which had unconditionally accepted the ...
The government of Mexico questioned whether the obligations contained in the first half of paragraph 3 of Article 92 of the Draft Charter would not conflict with the obligations of a government which had unconditionally accepted the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
THE TWENTYSIXTH YEAR OF THE WORLD COURT Manley 0 Hudson | 1 |
October 1948 NO | 4 |
THE PEACE OF WESTPHALIA 16481948 Leo Gross | 20 |
27 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted accordance action adopted agreed agreement American appear application approved Article Assembly authority British Charter claim Commission Committee concerned Conference considered Constitution convention Court decision delegates Department directly discussion documents draft Economic effect established existing fact final force foreign functions German Government held important Inter-American interest international law issue Italy jurisdiction Justice League of Nations London mandates March matter means meeting ment military nature obligations officers opinion Organization parties peace political possible practice present principles problem proposed question reasons recommendation referred regard relations representatives resolution respect rules Security Council Sept session Social Societies Soviet Statute submitted taken territory Text tion treaty trusteeship Union United Kingdom United Nations vote York