The American and English Encyclopedia of Law, Volume 8John Houston Merrill, Thomas Johnson Michie, Charles Frederic Williams, David Shephard Garland E. Thompson, 1889 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 90
Page 11
... ( Ohio ) Bar . JAMES M. KERR , of the Rochester ( N. Y. ) Bar . WILLIAM M. ROCKEL , of the Springfield ( Ohio ) Bar . GEORGE R. VAN DUSEN , of the Philadelphia Bar . LUTHER E. HEWITT , of the Philadelphia Bar . JNO . HOUSTON MERRILL and ...
... ( Ohio ) Bar . JAMES M. KERR , of the Rochester ( N. Y. ) Bar . WILLIAM M. ROCKEL , of the Springfield ( Ohio ) Bar . GEORGE R. VAN DUSEN , of the Philadelphia Bar . LUTHER E. HEWITT , of the Philadelphia Bar . JNO . HOUSTON MERRILL and ...
Page 57
... ( Ohio ) , 13 N. East , Rep . 493 ; Fortman v . Goepper , 14 Ohio St. 558 ; Brennan v . Whitaker , 15 Ohio St. 446 ; Ridgway Stove Co. v . Way , 6 N. E. Rep . 714 ; Sinker , Davis & Co. v . Com- paret , 62 Tex . 470 ; Frankland v . Moul ...
... ( Ohio ) , 13 N. East , Rep . 493 ; Fortman v . Goepper , 14 Ohio St. 558 ; Brennan v . Whitaker , 15 Ohio St. 446 ; Ridgway Stove Co. v . Way , 6 N. E. Rep . 714 ; Sinker , Davis & Co. v . Com- paret , 62 Tex . 470 ; Frankland v . Moul ...
Page 62
... Ohio St. 558 . 1. Pugh v . Arton , 8 Eq . Cas . ( L. R. ) 626 ; Lyde v . Russell , I B. & Ad . 394 ; Penton v . Robart , 2 East , 88 ; Weeton v . Woodcock , 7 M. & W. 14 ; Minshall v . Lloyd , 2 M. & W. , 460 ; Lee v . Risden , 7 Taunt ...
... Ohio St. 558 . 1. Pugh v . Arton , 8 Eq . Cas . ( L. R. ) 626 ; Lyde v . Russell , I B. & Ad . 394 ; Penton v . Robart , 2 East , 88 ; Weeton v . Woodcock , 7 M. & W. 14 ; Minshall v . Lloyd , 2 M. & W. , 460 ; Lee v . Risden , 7 Taunt ...
Page 95
... Ohio , 563. The supreme court sustained the order of the lower court , Brewer , J. , saying : " This question was before the court in the case of McCurdy v . Baker , II Kan . 111 , and we see no reason to change the views therein ...
... Ohio , 563. The supreme court sustained the order of the lower court , Brewer , J. , saying : " This question was before the court in the case of McCurdy v . Baker , II Kan . 111 , and we see no reason to change the views therein ...
Page 96
... Ohio . No decision was made , however , in that case upon the question , the other two justices apparently concurring with the views expressed by this court . The statute requires public notice for at least thirty days before the day of ...
... Ohio . No decision was made , however , in that case upon the question , the other two justices apparently concurring with the views expressed by this court . The statute requires public notice for at least thirty days before the day of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action of forcible agent alleged authority aver Bank Barb bond charged claim common law Conflict of Laws Conn contract court creditors debt debtor decree deed defendant domicil entry and detainer equity evidence execution executor false fire fixtures forcible detainer forcible entry foreclosure foreign attachment foreign corporation forged forgery garnishee Gratt held indorsement instrument intent to defraud Iowa Johns Jones judgment jurisdiction jury land lease liable Mass ment Minn mortgage mortgagor N. J. Eq non-resident offence Ohio St owner Paige Ch party payment person plaintiff possession premises proceeding promissory note purchaser R. R. Cas railroad Russ service of process Smith Stat statute sufficient suit tenant Tenn tion United unlawful detainer uttering uttering and publishing Wend writ York