Conditions precedent to suit to recover stock fraudulently procured, see Action or Suit, 1. Joinder of parties plaintiff in action to compel accounting for profit, see Parties, 3.
3. A director and manager of a corpo- ration is a trustee for stockholders. Black v. Simpson, 46: 137, 77 S. E. 1023, C.
other adequate remedy. Beidenkopf v. Des Moines L. Ins. Co. 46: 290, 142 N. W. 434, Iowa, -.
9. The right to maintain suit against the individual stockholders of an insolvent corporation to enforce their liability on un- paid stock subscriptions does not constitute such a plain, full, adequate remedy at law as to defeat a suit in equity by the receiv- er against all stockholders, for the collec tion and administration of the corporate 4. The president of a corporation who, assets as a trust fund for the benefit of the with knowledge that a bank will not renew creditors. Dill v. Ebey, 46: 440, 112 Pac. a note of the corporation without his guar-973, 27 Okla. 584. (Annotated) anty, telegraphs à request for renewal with Dissolution; insolvency. the assurance that he will arrange things satisfactorily upon his return, assumes the obligation of guarantor on the note accept- ed in accordance with such request. Ex- change Nat. Bank v. Pantages, 46: 484, 133 Pac. 1025, Wash. (Annotated)
Capital; stock and stockholders. Conditions precedent to suit to recover stock fraudulently procured, see Action or Suit, 1. Stockholders in bank, see Banks, 1–3. Validity of guaranty of dividends by corporation, see Contracts. 5. Effect of laches on rights of, see Limi- tation of Actions, 1.
Tax on transfer of stock see Taxes, 45.
Lapse of bequest of stock by exchange thereof for bonds, see Wills, 5. 5. Shares of the capital stock of a cor- poration, and their ownership, are created by the payment or agreement to pay for stock accepted by the corporation. United States Radiator Corp. v. State, 46: 585, 101 N. E. 783, 208 N. Y. 144.
6. A contract by a corporation to re- turn to a subscriber within a certain time the amount paid for his stock, which he is permitted to keep, is, in the absence of earn- ings sufficient to justify dividends of that amount, in contravention of a constitutional provision that corporations shall not issue stock except to bona fide subscribers there- for, nor issue any obligations for the pay- ment of money except for money or prop- erty received or labor done. Jorguson v. Apex Gold Mines, 46: 637, 133 Pac. 465, Wash.
7. A dissenting minority stockholder in a corporation cannot take advantage of the fact that the majority purchased stock of other holders for less than its value before selling all the assets of the company, un- less they can establish a general scheme to defraud of which the sale attacked is mere- ly a part. Beidenkopf v. Des Moines L. Ins. Co. 46: 290, 142 N. W. 434, Iowa,
S. Equity will not interfere to prevent the confirmation of a sale by the majority stockholders of the property of a business corporation, even though it is not insolvent, if, acting without fraud and upon reason able ground, they conclude that the exigen- cies of the business and the best interests of all concerned require it, at least if the protesting members will not be likely to suffer any injury for which there is no
10. The sale of all the assets of the cor- poration is not necessarily a dissolution within the meaning of a statute requiring unanimous consent of all the stockholders to a dissolution. Beidenkopf v. Des Moines L. Ins. Co. 46: 290, 142 N. W. 434, Iowa, -.
11. The receiver of an insolvent corpora- tion cannot, without a decree of dissolu- tion, maintain a bill to set aside a set-off by a bank of a fund deposited by the cor- poration with it, upon its unmatured note to the bank, as an unlawful preference to an indorser of the note. Hayden v. Citi- zens Nat. Bank, 46: 1059, 87 Atl. 672, 120 Md. 163.
able by the courts. Ekern v. McGovern, | requirement is a judicial function. Seward 46: 796, 142 N. W. 595, Wis. v. Denver & R. G. R. Co. 46: 242, 131 Pac. 980, N. M.
3. On grounds of public policy the court will not act coercively as to the gov- ernor except in case of extreme urgency. Ekern v. McGovern, 46: 796, 142 N. W. 595, Wis.
Original jurisdiction of appellate court. 11. The supreme court may, in aid of its original jurisdiction in quo warranto to punish a foreign insurance company for at- 4. The public policy which protects the tempting a usurpation and abuse of power, governor as a co-ordinate department of issue a temporary restraining order to pre- the government from being interfered with vent such conduct pending the hearing. by judicial mandate, except in dire emer-State ex rel. Barker v. Assurance Co. 46: gency, does not apply with full force to sub- 955, 158 S. W. 640, Mo.-. ordinates, acting by his authority. Ekern Interference with other courts; injunc- v. McGovern, 46: 796, 142 N. W. 595, tion. Wis. -.
12. An injunction will not be granted by 5. The court has no power under a the courts of one state to restrain the pros- Constitution dividing the government into ecution of an action on promissory notes departments, to review by direct proceed-in another state, where the only basis for ings the action of the governor in removing the application is that the notes are con- a mayor for cause under authority con- tracts of the former state, that both par- ferred by statute, although the proceeding ties and the complainant's witnesses reside for removal is quasi judicial. Germaine v. in the former state, and that the complain- Ferris, 46: 857, 142 N. W. 738, Mich..ant has no property in the other state, 6. While the power of removal of an officer for cause established by satisfactory proof is administrative in character, as dis- tinguished from that judicial power lodged by the constitution only in courts, it in- cludes that species of judicial power denom- inated quasi judicial and, as to that element, the result of the exercise of the power is reviewable by the court as to all matters of jurisdiction. Ekern v. McGov- ern, 46: 796, 142 N. W. 595, Wis. -
7. A constitutional provision conferring upon the supreme court jurisdiction to re- view an order of the state corporation com- mission, and providing that the said court "shall have the power, and it shall be its duty, to decide such cases on their merits," does not confer upon the court power to enter an order other than that under re- view, but only gives the court power to de- termine the reasonableness and lawfulness of the order made by the commission, and whether the corporation shall be compelled to comply with such order. Seward v. Den- ver & R. G. R. Co. 46: 242, 131 Pac. 980, N. M.
8. Executive recognition of the obliga- tion of the United States to surrender its own citizens under the extradition treaty with Italy of 1868, and the supplemental treaty of 1884, notwithstanding the refusal of the Italian government to surrender fu- gitives of Italian nationality committing crimes in the United States, is a waiver of, the breach, if any and leaves the treaty in force as the supreme law of the land, which must be recognized by the courts. Charlton v. Kelly, 46: 397, 57 L. ed. 1274, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 945, 229 U. S. 447.
9. Legislative declaration as to the construction to be given to a previous stat- ute is not conclusive on the courts. Straub v. Lyman Land & Invest. Co. 46: 941, 138 N. W. 957, S. D.
where there is nothing to show that the laws of the other state differ in any re- spect from those of the former state, or that the complainant will not receive the full benefit of the statute of the former state upon which he relies as a defense to the notes. Freick v. Hinkly, 46: 695, 141 N. W. 1096, 122 Minn. 24.
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. In mining lease, see Contracts, 4. Implied.
1. A conveyance of seven eighths of the timber and minerals on a tract of land, in consideration of the delivery of the other eighth to the owner, contains the implied condition that operations for their removal shall be begun within a reasonable time, although the property is located in a mountainous region without access to mar- ket, if, at the time the deed is made, a rail- road is projected to run in the vicinity of the property, although it was not built un- til many years afterward. Eastern Ken- tucky Mineral & Timber Co. v. Swann-Day Lumber Co. 46: 672, 146 S. W. 438, 148 Ky. 82.
2. The omission from a conveyance of the timber and minerals on a tract of land, of a stipulation as to when development operations shall begin, or of a condition re- serving the right of re-entry for inaction, will not prevent the enforcement of implied conditions that they shall be begun within a reasonable time. Eastern Kentucky Min- eral & Timber Co. v. Swann-Day Lumber Co. 46: 672, 146 S. W. 438, 148 Ky. 82. (Annotated)
What constitutes a breach.
3. The erection on the rear of a lot of a stable for use in a drayage, express, and plumbing business is a violation of a cove- nant in a deed of a city lot that not more than one dwelling house shall be erected on the lot, which shall cost not less than
10. While the fixing of rates, or the de- termination of the facilities to be afforded, a specified amount, and not to be used for in the first instance, is a legislative ques- manufacturing, mechanical, or business pur- tion, the determination of the reasonable-poses of any kind. McNeil v. Gary, 46: ness and lawfulness of the rate or other 1113, 40 App. D. C. 397.
4. A purchaser of a lot in a tract of land opened for residence purposes, the deeds to each of which contain covenants as to the character of building to be placed on the lot, may enforce such covenant ngainst the purchaser of another lot. Mc- Neil v. Gary, 46: 1113, 40 App. D. C. 397.
Review of discretion as to continuance, see Appeal and Error, 8. Review of discretion as to new trial, see Appeal and Error, 12. Error in instruction in criminal case, see Appeal and Error, 15, 20-24. Argument of counsel, see Appeal and Error, 25; Trial, 1. Forbidding driver of automobile whose machine causes injury to leave place of accident without leaving his name and address, see Automo- biles, 2.
Bail and recognizance, see Bail and Recognizance.
Illegal sale of drugs, see Drugs and Druggists.
Presumption and burden of proof in
criminal case, see Evidence, 9-11. Relevancy of evidence, generally, see Evidence, 17, 20-22.
As to extradition, see Extradition. Habeas corpus, see Habeas Corpus. Illegal sale of liquor, see Intoxicating Liquors.
Right to new trial in criminal case, see New Trial.
Fraudulent use of mails, see Postoffice. Reward for arrest, see Reward. Unreasonable searches and seizures, see Search and Seizure.
Ambiguity in penal statute, see Stat
Review of, on appeal, see Appeal and Error, 17.
Setting aside verdict for nominal dam- ages, see Appeal and Error, 27. Prejudicial error as to measure of, see Appeal and Error, 27.
Sufficiency of evidence to take question of damages to jury, see Trial, 2, 3. Exemplary or punitive.
1. Punitive damages may be awarded against a railroad company which refuses to stop a train upon request at a flag sta- alight. Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Moreland, 46: tion at which a passenger is entitled to 52, 61 So. 424, Miss. -. Liquidated damages.
2. The provision in a contract for the payment of the purchase price of real es tate in instalments, with interest, that in case all instalments are paid on or before maturity interest will be remitted, does not and therefore the purchaser is not entitled render the provision for interest a penalty, to a conveyance upon paying the principal without interest, if he has not paid the in- stalments according to the contract, al- though the delays were only slight and of little importance. Wrenn v. University Land Co. 46: 897, 133 Pac. 627, - Or. —. (Annotated)
3. One indictment for an offense is not liable for the difference between the price
which he is compelled to pay under his contract and the market price plus the cost of sending the message, although he is not shown to have ultimately suffered loss in the transaction. Henry v. Western U. Teleg. Co. 46: 412, 131 Pac. 812, (Annotated) 5. To determine the damages to be paid by a telegraph company for error in trans- mitting a message quoting prices on sheep, their market value may, where there was no market where they were located, be de- termined by the ruling price at the nearest market, less cost of getting them there and the probable shrinkage in transportation. Henry v. Western U. Teleg. Co. 46: 412, 131 Pac. 812, Wash.
6. One third of the present value of the property is not the proper measure of dam- Under an amendment of a statute ages in case a parent induces a woman to permitting recovery for death caused by marry her son by fraudulently represent-negligence by omitting the reference to negli- ing that the son is the owner of a specified parcel of real estate. Beach v. Beach, 46: 98, 141 N. W. 921, Iowa, Personal injuries; death. Prejudicial error as to, see Appeal and Error, 27.
7. A spectator injured at a baseball game who is entitled to recover of the man- agement for such injuries is entitled to re- cover as special damages the reasonable value of the nursing necessitated on account of the injury, notwithstanding such nursing was rendered by a member of the family without expectation of payment. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & A. Asso. 46: 606, 142 N. W. 706, 122 Minn. 327.
8. $15,000 is not excessive to award to a man twenty-three years old, struck by a train at a railroad crossing and rendered unconscious for six or eight hours; his skull slightly fractured; his hip socket fractured so that he could not walk without help for a year; his nervous system shocked; his pel- vic bone and lower spinal processes dis- placed, causing partial paralysis; and his ability to work at his trade, from which he was earning $125 a month, destroyed. Wal- ters v. Chicago, M. & P. S. R. Co. 46: 702, 133 Pac. 357, Mont.-. Injury to real property; nuisance.
Review of, on appeal, see Appeal and Error, 17.
9. The measure of damages for de- struction of a meadow by fire is the cost of reseeding it plus the rental value of the property during the time its owner is de- prived of crops therefrom by reason of the fire. Couch v. Kansas City, S. R. Co. 46: 555, 158 S. W. 347, Mo. -.
10. The removal or destruction of or damage to trees planted by a lot owner or his grantor, and growing upon that part of the street contiguous to his lot, is a proper element of damages for change of street grade so far as it may affect the difference in the value of the property before and after the change of grade. Stocking v. Lincoln, 46:107, 142 N. W. 104, Neb. -.
gence, and permitting a recovery in all actions surviving to an administrator for injuries resulting in death, a recovery can he had for death resulting from injuries intentionally inflicted, although the statute provides that the action must be brought within one year "from the neglect com- plained of." Kling v. Torello, 46: 930, 87 Atl. 987, Conn. (Annotated)
Resort to debates in Congress in de- termining meaning of interstate commerce act, see Statutes, 4.
DEBTOR AND CREDITOR. When relation of debtor and creditor between attachment creditor and surety on bond arises, see Attach- ment.
As to exemption, see Exemptions. Conveyances fraudulent as to creditors, see Fraudulent Conveyances. As to garnishment, see Garnishment. Joint creditors and debtors, see Joint Creditors and Debtors.
Administration of estates of, see Exec- utors and Administrators.
DECLARATIONS.
Evidence of, see Evidence, 15, 16. In pleading, see Pleading, 4-6.
Cancelation of, see Cancelation of In-
Covenants in general, see Covenants and Conditions.
Creation of base or determinable fee by lease, see Landlord and Tenant, 1.
DE FACTO OFFICERS. See Officers, 4.
Creation of, by lease, see Landlord and J. Tenant, 1.
2. Although it is ordinarily the duty of a husband who has been deserted by his wife to make proper approaches to her and sincere efforts to induce her to return to him, where it is apparent that such ap proaches and efforts would be entirely fu
Sending through mails offer to sell tile, no such duty devolves upon him. loaded dice, see Postoffice.
Rogers v. Rogers (N. J. Err. & App.) 46: 711, 86 Atl. 935, N. J. 3. The mere fact of a failure to provide
Of corporations generally, see Corpo-sufficient support for a wife does not con- rations, 3.
stitute desertion by the husband under the
« PreviousContinue » |