International Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 31
Page 7
... idea of a body of law common to all men assumed a different meaning when states multiplied and writer after writer redefined and qualified its meaning . Jus gentium became the subject of many controversies . Among the qualifying terms ...
... idea of a body of law common to all men assumed a different meaning when states multiplied and writer after writer redefined and qualified its meaning . Jus gentium became the subject of many controversies . Among the qualifying terms ...
Page 9
... ideas of what it ought to be . Modern international law treats mainly of what is , but what is in interna- tional relations is always conditioned by a recognition of what ought to be . § 7. Jural Bases The nature of modern international ...
... ideas of what it ought to be . Modern international law treats mainly of what is , but what is in interna- tional relations is always conditioned by a recognition of what ought to be . § 7. Jural Bases The nature of modern international ...
Page 14
... idea as to what jus gen- tium was , of course varied with times . Under the Empire it lost its old meaning . See Cicero , “ De Officiis , " III . , 17 ; Livy , VI . , IX . , 11 ; I. , 14 ; V. , 36 ; Sallust , Bell . Jug . , " XXII ...
... idea as to what jus gen- tium was , of course varied with times . Under the Empire it lost its old meaning . See Cicero , “ De Officiis , " III . , 17 ; Livy , VI . , IX . , 11 ; I. , 14 ; V. , 36 ; Sallust , Bell . Jug . , " XXII ...
Page 15
... idea of one common supremacy was deep - rooted . Political assimi- lation followed the expansion of political privileges . ( b ) The Church . A similar unifying influence was found in the growth of the Christian Church which knew no ...
... idea of one common supremacy was deep - rooted . Political assimi- lation followed the expansion of political privileges . ( b ) The Church . A similar unifying influence was found in the growth of the Christian Church which knew no ...
Page 16
... ideas of equality of state powers necessary for the development of international law , though it did emphasize the doctrine of sovereignty as based on land in distinction from the personal sovereignty of earlier days . ( d ) The ...
... ideas of equality of state powers necessary for the development of international law , though it did emphasize the doctrine of sovereignty as based on land in distinction from the personal sovereignty of earlier days . ( d ) The ...
Contents
217 | |
227 | |
229 | |
235 | |
239 | |
245 | |
270 | |
277 | |
71 | |
74 | |
88 | |
94 | |
95 | |
128 | |
139 | |
148 | |
150 | |
157 | |
198 | |
285 | |
298 | |
309 | |
310 | |
323 | |
331 | |
364 | |
447 | |
449 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement ambassadors Appendix arms army authority belliger belligerent Belligerent occupation belonging Britain capture cargo chargé d'affaires citizens civil claim commander commerce consular consuls contraband convention Declaration of Paris diplomatic agent doctrine Droit enemy enemy's European exempt exercise extradition flag of truce force foreign France Franco-German War Hague Peace Conference held hostile immunities international law intervention laws of war letter of credence liable maritime ment military Monroe Doctrine nations Naval War Code necessary negotiations neutral territory neutral vessel obligation occupied officers pacific blockade parole parties peace persons political port powers practice principle prisoners prisoners of war privileges prize court proclamation protection provisions punishment recognized regard regulations relations right of asylum rules Russia seizure ships sovereign Spain territorial jurisdiction tion Treaties of U. S. troops U. S. Naval U. S. Rev U. S. Sts United usually violation waters Whart wounded
Popular passages
Page 402 - Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules.
Page 101 - The Suez Maritime Canal shall always be free and open, in time of war as in time of peace, to every vessel of commerce or of war, without distinction of flag.
Page 401 - In deciding the matters submitted to the Arbitrators they shall be governed by the following three rules, which are agreed upon by the High Contracting Parties as rules to be taken as applicable to the case...
Page 401 - First to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace...
Page 279 - States from which a vessel of the other belligerent (whether the same shall be a ship of war, a privateer, or a merchant ship) shall have previously departed until after the expiration of at least twenty-four hours from the departure of such last-mentioned vessel beyond the jurisdiction of the United States.
Page 358 - Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective; that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of the enemy.
Page 60 - Whereas we are happily at peace with all sovereign powers and states: "And whereas hostilities have unhappily commenced between the Government of the United States of America and certain states styling themselves the Confederate States of America...
Page 381 - ... colony, district, or people, to cruise or commit hostilities against the subjects, citizens, or property of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States are at peace...
Page 361 - The Contracting Powers agree to prohibit, for a period extending to the close of the Third Peace Conference, the discharge of projectiles and explosives from balloons or by other new methods of a similar nature.
Page 325 - ... outlawry; on the contrary, it abhors such outrage. The sternest retaliation should follow the murder committed in consequence of such proclamation, made by whatever authority. Civilized nations look with horror upon offers of rewards for the assassination of enemies, as relapses into barbarism.