International Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 36
Page 16
... possession of land and gradation of classes , discouraged the develop- ment of the ideas of equality of state powers necessary for the development of international law , though it did emphasize the doctrine of sovereignty as based on ...
... possession of land and gradation of classes , discouraged the develop- ment of the ideas of equality of state powers necessary for the development of international law , though it did emphasize the doctrine of sovereignty as based on ...
Page 21
... possessions brought new international issues . The basis of mod- ern territorial acquisition was found in the Roman law of occupatio , and its laws of river boundaries were almost exactly followed.2 From the Treaty of Aix- la - Chapelle ...
... possessions brought new international issues . The basis of mod- ern territorial acquisition was found in the Roman law of occupatio , and its laws of river boundaries were almost exactly followed.2 From the Treaty of Aix- la - Chapelle ...
Page 52
... possessed by neutralized states varies . The fact that these states are not fully sovereign in the field of international law in no way affects their competence except in respect to matters covered by the conditions of neutralization ...
... possessed by neutralized states varies . The fact that these states are not fully sovereign in the field of international law in no way affects their competence except in respect to matters covered by the conditions of neutralization ...
Page 68
... as may be in accord with . its policy . § 32. Equality All states , the existence of which has been recog- nized by the family of states , are regarded as possessed 7 of equal rights in political affairs , so far 68 INTERNATIONAL LAW.
... as may be in accord with . its policy . § 32. Equality All states , the existence of which has been recog- nized by the family of states , are regarded as possessed 7 of equal rights in political affairs , so far 68 INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Page 70
... possessions within its limits as against other states , yet the effect of this right is somewhat modified by the fact of public or private ownership , particularly as regards the laws of war , neutrality , and intercourse . § 35 ...
... possessions within its limits as against other states , yet the effect of this right is somewhat modified by the fact of public or private ownership , particularly as regards the laws of war , neutrality , and intercourse . § 35 ...
Contents
217 | |
227 | |
229 | |
235 | |
239 | |
245 | |
270 | |
277 | |
71 | |
74 | |
88 | |
94 | |
95 | |
128 | |
139 | |
148 | |
150 | |
157 | |
198 | |
285 | |
298 | |
309 | |
310 | |
323 | |
331 | |
364 | |
447 | |
449 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement ambassadors Appendix arms army authority belliger belligerent Belligerent occupation belonging Britain capture cargo chargé d'affaires citizens civil claim commander commerce consular consuls contraband convention Declaration of Paris diplomatic agent doctrine Droit enemy enemy's European exempt exercise extradition flag of truce force foreign France Franco-German War Hague Peace Conference held hostile immunities international law intervention laws of war letter of credence liable maritime ment military Monroe Doctrine nations Naval War Code necessary negotiations neutral territory neutral vessel obligation occupied officers pacific blockade parole parties peace persons political port powers practice principle prisoners prisoners of war privileges prize court proclamation protection provisions punishment recognized regard regulations relations right of asylum rules Russia seizure ships sovereign Spain territorial jurisdiction tion Treaties of U. S. troops U. S. Naval U. S. Rev U. S. Sts United usually violation waters Whart wounded
Popular passages
Page 402 - Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these rules.
Page 101 - The Suez Maritime Canal shall always be free and open, in time of war as in time of peace, to every vessel of commerce or of war, without distinction of flag.
Page 401 - In deciding the matters submitted to the Arbitrators they shall be governed by the following three rules, which are agreed upon by the High Contracting Parties as rules to be taken as applicable to the case...
Page 401 - First to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace...
Page 279 - States from which a vessel of the other belligerent (whether the same shall be a ship of war, a privateer, or a merchant ship) shall have previously departed until after the expiration of at least twenty-four hours from the departure of such last-mentioned vessel beyond the jurisdiction of the United States.
Page 358 - Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective; that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of the enemy.
Page 60 - Whereas we are happily at peace with all sovereign powers and states: "And whereas hostilities have unhappily commenced between the Government of the United States of America and certain states styling themselves the Confederate States of America...
Page 381 - ... colony, district, or people, to cruise or commit hostilities against the subjects, citizens, or property of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States are at peace...
Page 361 - The Contracting Powers agree to prohibit, for a period extending to the close of the Third Peace Conference, the discharge of projectiles and explosives from balloons or by other new methods of a similar nature.
Page 325 - ... outlawry; on the contrary, it abhors such outrage. The sternest retaliation should follow the murder committed in consequence of such proclamation, made by whatever authority. Civilized nations look with horror upon offers of rewards for the assassination of enemies, as relapses into barbarism.