tal strength necessary to sustain a deed must be such as to enable the grantor, in dealing with his property, to understand and protect his own interest. Greene v. Maxwell, 251 Ill. 335. Cyrus W. Noble was a lawyer, residing in Kansas. The answer alleges he was the favorite and best beloved brother of Clarinda Alice Noble, to whom she looked for counsel and direction in her graver business affairs. He visited his sister about once a year and represented her and her mother in their business matters, together with his brother the appellee James F. Noble. The proof also shows that Cyrus W. Noble stated he desired to procure a conveyance from his sister for the purpose of protecting her in the use and benefit of her land during her lifetime, and at her Ideath it would be divided between him and his brothers. Appellee James F. Noble testified that Cyrus sent him a deed to be executed by their sister, but she refused, at his request, to sign it and he returned it to Cyrus. Afterwards Cyrus visited his sister and she executed the deed. It was testified that Cyrus, in speaking of his sister, said she was incapable, mentally, of protecting herself and her business interests; and Jonathan I. Moorehead testified to a conversation between Cyrus and his brother James F. Noble, after the deed was made, in which Cyrus said they would buy out the interest of their other brother, who resided in Oregon, and he and his brother James would divide the land between them. James F. Noble testified to the same conversation. It was admitted by appellants in their answer to the bill that after the death of Clarinda Alice Noble, and before the death of Cyrus, the rent from the land was equally divided among the three brothers, but it was alleged this was in pursuance of an agreement among the three brothers, which was to continue only during the lifetime of Cyrus. No proof was made of any such agreement, nor was it explained why, if Cyrus was a bona fide owner of the land, he divided the rents with his brothers until his death, which was four years after the death of Clarinda. The proof abundantly warranted the conclusion that a confidential or fiduciary relation existed between Cyrus W. Noble and his sister. The conveyance was without any consideration and under circumstances that the law would imply a trust. Where one obtains the legal title to property by virtue of a confidential relation and influence, under such circumstances that he ought not in equity and good conscience be permitted to hold it, a court of equity will raise a trust by construction, convert him into a trustee, and require the execution of the trust in such manner as to protect the rights of the real parties in interest. (Allen v. Jackson, 122 Ill. 567; Stewart v. Duffy, 116 id. 47.) The term "fiduciary or confidential relation" is a comprehensive one, and exists whenever influence has been acquired and abused or confidence has been reposed and betrayed. Stahl v. Stahl, 214 Ill. 131. It may be conceded the bill is not skillfully drawn, but it is sufficient to authorize a decree declaring a resulting trust in Cyrus W. Noble. In addition to the specific relief prayed for, the bill prayed for such other and further relief, general and special, as to equity might appertain. Under the allegations and prayer of the bill and the proofs offered, we think it clear the decree entered was warranted, and it is affirmed. Decree affirmed. INDEX. ABSTRACTS OF TITLE. when proposed vendor of land is not bound to furnish an ACCOUNTING. an agent cannot rightfully deal in subject matter of his ACTIONS AND DEFENSES. PAGE. 392 480 481 plea of not guilty in ejectment is not a denial that defend- when the court may direct verdict for plaintiff under sec- 58 what constitutes the cause of action against a benefit so- rules governing dismissal of actions in general apply to plaintiff in ejectment may dismiss suit after judgment in land taken by executor in collecting a note is part of per- 58 61 115 115 115 122 the existence of a corporation de facto is no defense to 144 offer to sell land may be withdrawn before acceptance- ACTIONS AND DEFENSES.-Continued. PAGE. ... 213 when employee does not commit an actionable wrong in 213 parties to an illegal contract who are in pari delicto are ..... 314 a void marriage may be annulled though the parties are .... 314 349 ... 349 ..... a party seeking to redeem after the statutory period has ..... ... 369 420 420 450 what does not render sale to guardian void.... ... 493 ......... 545 549 when equity has jurisdiction to set aside a deed-defend- |