The American Journal of International Law, Volume 73James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1979 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 115
... parties was immaterial . The French sought to bolster this argument by noting that the delay in communicating the decision to the parties took place with their consent ; therefore , since the parties did not ask for an alteration of the ...
... parties was immaterial . The French sought to bolster this argument by noting that the delay in communicating the decision to the parties took place with their consent ; therefore , since the parties did not ask for an alteration of the ...
Page 462
... parties may be characterized as an " obligation of result . " In itself it says nothing about the means or conduct to achieve the specified result . However , Article 2 goes on to specify means by which the parties are to carry out ...
... parties may be characterized as an " obligation of result . " In itself it says nothing about the means or conduct to achieve the specified result . However , Article 2 goes on to specify means by which the parties are to carry out ...
Page 767
... parties should present their arguments before or after the production of the evidence ; the parties shall , however , retain the right to comment on the evidence given . 2. The order in which the parties will be heard , the method of ...
... parties should present their arguments before or after the production of the evidence ; the parties shall , however , retain the right to comment on the evidence given . 2. The order in which the parties will be heard , the method of ...
Contents
April 1979 NO | 2 |
User Charges in International Aviation | 42 |
Equitable Delimitation of Continental Shelf M D Blecher | 60 |
Copyright | |
29 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement AJIL American application arbitration Article 296 authority claim coastal commercial Committee common deposit Community concerning conference constituted consultation continental shelf contract Council court of appeals decision declaration delimitation developing countries diplomatic disputes documents economic zone effect equidistance equitable established European Convention exclusive economic zone exploitation export Federal fisheries flag flags of convenience foreign geostationary orbit Government human rights ICNT Immunities Act Immunity Act 1978 Index interest International Court international law international legal investment issue jurisdiction legislation limited ment mineral NATO Negotiating Group obligation operations OPIC organizations Outer Space Treaty paragraph parties Pertamina plaintiffs political practice principle problems procedure proceedings provisions question reference regard relations Republic respect rules seabed session settlement ship South Africa Sovereign Immunities Soviet Statute supra note tion transnational corporations treaty UNCLOS UNCTAD United Kingdom United Nations University