The American Journal of International Law, Volume 73James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1979 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 292
... treaties and that whether a treaty should be deemed to be in effect for international law and foreign relations purposes generally will be determined by the position of the Executive . Thus , in Charlton v . Kelly , 229 U.S. 447 ( 1913 ) ...
... treaties and that whether a treaty should be deemed to be in effect for international law and foreign relations purposes generally will be determined by the position of the Executive . Thus , in Charlton v . Kelly , 229 U.S. 447 ( 1913 ) ...
Page 648
... treaty does not , of course , terminate the treaty ; a treaty is not between governments but between states , and the state of China persists and has not been affected by the recognition of a different government . This particular treaty ...
... treaty does not , of course , terminate the treaty ; a treaty is not between governments but between states , and the state of China persists and has not been affected by the recognition of a different government . This particular treaty ...
Page 653
... treaty , one - third of the Senate ( plus one ) can keep us in , even if the President and two - thirds of the Senate ( minus one ) now want out of it . One might rather argue from the treaty clause that as it takes the President and ...
... treaty , one - third of the Senate ( plus one ) can keep us in , even if the President and two - thirds of the Senate ( minus one ) now want out of it . One might rather argue from the treaty clause that as it takes the President and ...
Contents
April 1979 NO | 2 |
User Charges in International Aviation | 42 |
Equitable Delimitation of Continental Shelf M D Blecher | 60 |
Copyright | |
29 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement AJIL American application arbitration Article 296 authority claim coastal commercial Committee common deposit Community concerning conference constituted consultation continental shelf contract Council court of appeals decision declaration delimitation developing countries diplomatic disputes documents economic zone effect equidistance equitable established European Convention exclusive economic zone exploitation export Federal fisheries flag flags of convenience foreign geostationary orbit Government human rights ICNT Immunities Act Immunity Act 1978 Index interest International Court international law international legal investment issue jurisdiction legislation limited ment mineral NATO Negotiating Group obligation operations OPIC organizations Outer Space Treaty paragraph parties Pertamina plaintiffs political practice principle problems procedure proceedings provisions question reference regard relations Republic respect rules seabed session settlement ship South Africa Sovereign Immunities Soviet Statute supra note tion transnational corporations treaty UNCLOS UNCTAD United Kingdom United Nations University