The American Journal of International Law, Volume 54American Society of International Law, 1960 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 126
... considered a procedural one ? ' ' 31 The result of the vote was 10 in favor and 1 against ( U.S.S.R. ) , and the President declared : Therefore , the resolution should be considered procedural . It is the interpretation of the chair ...
... considered a procedural one ? ' ' 31 The result of the vote was 10 in favor and 1 against ( U.S.S.R. ) , and the President declared : Therefore , the resolution should be considered procedural . It is the interpretation of the chair ...
Page 309
... considered this 1951 agreement only as a pre- liminary contract ( Vorvertrag ) , since the legislation envisaged was never passed . The later nationalization might have been considered a violation of the 1951 Agreement as a " venire ...
... considered this 1951 agreement only as a pre- liminary contract ( Vorvertrag ) , since the legislation envisaged was never passed . The later nationalization might have been considered a violation of the 1951 Agreement as a " venire ...
Page 400
... considered more likely that the Security Council's action was based upon a desire to bring to an end a situation fraught with po- tential danger to peace than . . . to change a long established rule of international law ...
... considered more likely that the Security Council's action was based upon a desire to bring to an end a situation fraught with po- tential danger to peace than . . . to change a long established rule of international law ...
Contents
January 1960 NO | 1 |
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ORDER AT SEA AND THE NATIONALITY OF SHIPS Myres | 25 |
VOL | 54 |
27 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreement alien American Antarctica application arbitral Article Assembly authority British Charter claims Commission Committee competence concerned conclusion Conference constitute consul consular contract Convention countries Court of Justice decision declared dispute draft Droit International effect established exequatur exercise fishing flag force foreign functions Geneva Convention genuine link German Government Guatemala high seas Ibid immunity India Indonesian interests International Court international law International Law Commission judgment jurisdiction Liechtenstein maritime matter ment national character national law Netherlands Nottebohm nuclear obligations official organization paragraph parties peace political Portugal present principles private international law problems procedure Professor proposal purposes question recognized referred regard relations resolution respect rule sanctions Security Council session ships signature sovereign sovereign immunity Soviet Union special rapporteur status Suez Canal Supp territorial sea tion tional treaty U.N. Doc United Arab Republic United Kingdom United Nations vessels vote