Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 1-13Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2004 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 9
... basic patent in force ? As indicated above , the examiner's preliminary view was that none of the requests complied with the condition of Art.3 ( a ) of the Regulation that the product should be protected by a basic patent in force . The ...
... basic patent in force ? As indicated above , the examiner's preliminary view was that none of the requests complied with the condition of Art.3 ( a ) of the Regulation that the product should be protected by a basic patent in force . The ...
Page 27
... basic patent or his successor in title . Article 1 ( c ) mentions the basic patents which may be designated for the purpose of the procedure for the grant of a certificate , namely those which protect a product as such , a process to ...
... basic patent or his successor in title . Article 1 ( c ) mentions the basic patents which may be designated for the purpose of the procedure for the grant of a certificate , namely those which protect a product as such , a process to ...
Page 30
... basic patent " and the Advocate General's interpretation of Art.3 ( c ) as stated in the passage quoted above : " that no other marketing authorization relating to that product have been used as the basis for supplementary protection of ...
... basic patent " and the Advocate General's interpretation of Art.3 ( c ) as stated in the passage quoted above : " that no other marketing authorization relating to that product have been used as the basis for supplementary protection of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
active ingredients appeal assignment Balloons Pty Ltd basic patent Bauwens Buckby Camelot Group Cameron Balloons Cameron Balloons Ltd Chemical Industries Ltd's claimant claims combination of active Community trade mark comptroller consider contract Conway Ltd's Patent Corporation v Zipher Cuban Cuban law Cyprotex Davies decision defendant defendant's design right difloxacin domain name DOUBLEMINT effect ELIZABETH EMANUEL entitled evidence filed goodwill granted Hartington Conway Ltd's Industries Ltd's SPC infringement intellectual property Inter Lotto inventive concept inventor issue judgment Kavanagh Balloons Pty lansoprazole licence Ltd v Cameron Ltd's Patent Applications Ltd's SPC Application Markem Corporation marketing authorisation Northstar OHIM operculum ownership parachute paras parties patent application Patent Office printer prior question Radio Taxis referred registered relation relevant requests Research Agreement Robert Tweedy Seaquest Sheffield submission Supplementary protection certificate Takeda Chemical Industries Thermal Printer Ultraframe University of Sheffield vent Wilsey witness statement words XIRL Xlok Xtralite Zipher Ltd No.1