petition must be presented as soon after the decision is made as practicable. No petition will be received on the last day of the term, other than in cases then decided. A rehearing will be refused where no new argument is made, and no new authority adduced, and no material fact is pointed out as overlooked. Holmes v. Eason, 8 Lea, 763; Hume v. Bank, 10 Lea, 7, 43 Am. Rep. 290; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 125 Tenn. 658, 691-693, 148 S. W. 671. 33. Decrees.-Counsel may present decrees on any morning before the call of the docket is begun but decrees about which counsel do not differ may be entered without being presented to the court. They will be prepared by counsel of the successful party, and submitted to the counsel on the other side. In the event of disagreement about the same, the party disagreeing shall note objections in writing, and these, with decree or judgment prepared, and such briefs as counsel on the other side may desire to prevent therewith, will be handed in to the court, when the decree or judgment will be examined and corrected, if necessary, or further instructions given counsel. If found correct, it will be given to the clerk with order to enter it. All decrees of this court will be executed by its own clerks unless otherwise ordered forfeited for failure to comply with the rules of this court in making out and filing transcripts. 35. Postage.-Postage expended by the clerks of this court in transmitting process and other official papers to the officers of inferior courts, and that expended by the officers of such courts shall be taxed as costs in the case in which the same is expended. by the court. 34. Taxation of Costs.-The clerk of this court shall retax all bills of cost sent up from the inferior courts and correct the same, so that no illegal item of cost may be embraced in any bill of cost sent out from this court. It shall also be his duty to disallow the costs of the clerks of inferior courts ADMISSION OF ATTORNEYS. 36. Admission to the bar of this court will be allowed upon motion, the applicant appearing in open court and representing through a reputable member of the bar, that he is a citizen of this state, a man of good moral character, has been duly licensed to practice law under the statutes of this state, and that he intends to reside here permanently and practice his profession. Citizens of this and other states who do not intend to practice their profession regularly in the courts of this state will not be admitted. No attorney can appear in any case until he has been duly admitted; provided, nonresident attorneys desiring to argue a case in which they have been employed, will, by comity, be allowed to do so, when presented by a member of the bar of this court. sede all rules of this court heretofore made These rules will take the place and super tive and be enforced from and after January and published, and they will all become effec1, 1913. The clerk will enter the same upon the minutes of the court at Knoxville, Tennessee, and the Attorney-General and reporter will publish them in the next volume of the reports of the opinions of the court. CASES REPORTED Abeel, Citizens' Nat. Bank of Waco v. Adams v. Metropolitan St. R. Co. (Mo. Akin, National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Alexander, Keeton v. (Ky.). 902 J., Pat 59 terson v. (Mo. App.).... American Nat. Bank v. Corsicana Nat. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.).. Anderson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Arctic Ice Co. v. Franklin Electric & Ice .1197 .1196 713 ..1037 Page 609 38 Co.'s Assignee (Ky.)...... 973 Austin Fire Ins. Co., Polemanakos v. (Tex. .1134 Auten v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. (Ark.) 873 .1075 1198 Badger Lumber Co. v. W. F. Lyons Ice & Power Co. (Mo. App.).. Bakrow, Holzbog v. (Ky.)... 669 761 (Mo. 587 .1196 (Mo. Banks v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).. 848 Barnett v. Elliott (Tex. Civ. App.). 815 Beard v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. (Tex. Beasley, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas Bois, City of Texarkana v. (Tex. Civ. Bolin v. Tyrol Inv. Co. (Mo. App.).... Bonds v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Bowman & Cockrell, Baker v. (Ky.).. 587 681 .1185 49 Bridge's Son v. Kelly (Ky.). Beaumont, S. L. & W. R. Co. v. Bishop (Tex. Civ. App.).. Beaumont, S. L. & W. R. Co., Cook v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. Beavers' Adm'r v. Ashlock (Ky.). Bell v. Board of Directors of Jefferson ..... 276 267 ..1167 889 633 Page Benge's Adm'r v. Eversole (Ky.)................ Birge-Forbes & Co., Sweetwater Cotton 471 975 Bishop v. Bishop (Ky.). Assu Blewitt, Simpson v. (Ark.).. Board of Council of City of Danville, Board of Directors of Jefferson County .... .1125 123 989 390 .1198 528 Burton v. Cowles' Adm'x (Ky.). 975 176 705 720 687 Enginemen, Roberts v. (Ky.)....... Brown v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 241 Buchanan, Arlington Hotel Co. v. (Ark.).. 895 573 657 Buffalo Pitts Co., Newman v. (Tex. Civ. 252 Burk, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 629 Burk Bros. Meat & Provision Co., Hanlin v. (Mo. App.).. 547 Burt v. Gabbert (Mo. App.). 838 782 117 771 ..1199 696 924 702 973 374 .1196 488 950 863 230 xiv ......... Page 403 73 158 Bussey v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)... Cagel v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Co. (Ky.) Calender, Stix v. (Ky.). ... Camp v. Riddle (Tenn.). Capps v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.). Carpenter, Siler v. (Ky.).. Carpenter, Summers v. (Ky.).. Carroll v. First State Bank of Denison Carter v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Tex- Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. First Nat. ... Co. v. City of Texarkana v. Bois (Tex. Civ. App.) 644 844 Cockrell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). .1064 186 Coker v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) ...1198 City of Lebanon, Spalding v. (Ky.).... 632 397 987 626 662 .... ... 158 Chesapeake & O. R. Co., France v. (Ky.).. 757 769 830 Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., Hickey v. (Mo. 24 875 Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., Johnson v. (Mo. App.).. 5 Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co. v. O'Dell (Tex. 111 .1098 Chicago, R. I. & G. R. Co., Overton v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. McCrary (Ark.) Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., Whiteaker v. (Mo.) 1198 ..1009 Chicago & A. R. Co., Globe & Rutgers Fire 907 Ins. Co. v. (Mo. App.). 485 Ky.). Childers, Nash v. .1067 Childers, Riddell v. (Ky.). Childers & Only, Louisville & N. R. Co. v. (Ky.) 260 ... Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co., Helm v. 945 337 Citizens' Nat. Bank of Waco v. Abeel (Tex. 609 424 ... Collins v. Commonwealth (Ky.) Commercial Union Assur. Co., Blakely v. Commons, Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. (Tex. Citizens' Planing Mill Co. v. Tunstall Citizens' Ry. & Light Co., Arlington City of Ft. Smith, Hysell v. (Ark.). Page 751 771 500 499 507 952 Commonwealth v. Provident Sav. Life As- . 476 .1099 767 1066 Commonwealth v. Saylor (Ky.). ... 878 Commonwealth, Wright v. (Ky.). 582 925 Conner, New York Life Ins. Co. v. (Ky.).. 491 937 783 Connor, Miller v. (Mo. App.). 937 Conrad, Conrad's Ex'r v. (Ky.). Conrad's Ex'r v. Conrad (Ky.). Cook v. Beaumont, S. L. & W. R. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.)... ... 123 Cook, East Tennessee Tel. Co. v. (Ky.).... 166 223 465 Cook y. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Cooper, Cotton v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Cooper Gin Co., Cooper Cotton Oil Co. v. Corrigan v. Goss (Tex. Civ. App.).. Coston v. Lee Wilson & Co. (Ark.). 658 853 80 Coulter v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 1161 417 576 506 868 78 593 343 Commonwealth, Collins v. (Ky.). 173 495 383 134 257 509 ...... ... .1084 886 252 496 .1038 443 .1107 252 .1080 .1061 1042 476 1032 145 366 ... .1103 782 Cowles' Adm'x, Burton v. (Ky.). 604 786 468 759 733 .1077 919 ... Crawford, Lexington & E. R. Co. v. (Ky.) 267 .1061 949 767 656 134 Curry, City of Ft. Worth v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 226 597 382 401 401 652 Dallas Gas Co. v. Wheat (Tex. Civ. App.) 980 ... Daugherty, Texas Co. v. (Tex. Civ. .1198 Day_v. Hunnicutt (Tex. Civ. App.). .1130 Denman, International Order of Twelve Denton v. Texas & P. R. Co. (Tex. Civ. Dickens v. State (Ark.). Dominy, Southwestern Telegraph & Tele- Dooley, Houston Belt & Terminal R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. Driver, King v. (Tex. Civ. App.). .... Page App.) 129 App.) 410 385 459 829 Page First Nat. Bank, J. I. Case Threshing 662 First Nat. Bank, Jones v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 126 632 First State Bank of Hubbard v. Hubbard First State Bank's Receiver v. Farmers' Fisher v. State (Ark.). 980 113 Fisher v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 985 Ford v. Commonwealth (Ky.). 315 Ft. Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Schulte (Ark.) 855 893 Fowler v. Ratterree (Ark.). 594 France v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co. (Ky.)... 757 Freeborn Engineering & Construction Co., 74 Easter v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)..... Edwards v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 606 607 512 Ellis' Adm'r v. Louisville, H. & St. L. R. 34 1048 80 709 288 289 Ellison, General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. v. Kelly Coal Co. (Ky.).. (Mo. App.)...... 1141 .1019 238 219 150 .1071 Fair v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).. Fant, Sullivan v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 914 ... 274 282 ..1187 er v. (Ky.).. 250 Farmers' Coal Co., Martin v. (Mo. App.).. 816 Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia, 537 67 777 870 139 330 .1132 250 210 683 710 241 Golden v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 907 957 .1038 1 399 Goodman, Eastern State Hospital v. (Ky.) 171 107 483 Gormley v. Overstreet (Ky.). Goss, Corrigan v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Grand Camp of Colored Woodmen of Ar- Grant v. Ledwidge (Ark.). Gray, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas 434 Greber, Hartfield v. (Tex. Civ. App.)...... 603 652 714 926 400 200 993 xvi Greenwell's Adm'r, Louisville & N. R. Co. Gregory v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. (Mo. Grimes v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). (Tex. Civ. App.). Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., Beard v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Currie Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., Riley v. Oliven Co. Page 479 830 689 .1041 .1069 17 ..1103 (Tex. (Tex. (Tex. Louis .... Holt, Hunter v. (Tex. Civ. App.) Holzbog v. Bakrow (Ky.). Hooper v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Hot Springs Savings, Trust & Guaranty Houk v. Robinson (Tex. Civ. App.). Houston Car Wheel & Machine Co. v. Houston Motor Co., Harlingen Land & Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Ellis (Tex. Civ. Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Ellis (Tex. Cix. Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Hirsch (Tex. Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Loofs (Tex. Howard v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 238 Howle, Eminent Household of Columbian .1197 Huffman v. State (Ark.). 447 Humphries v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 756 Hysell v. Ft. Smith (Ark.). V. 633 656 595 540 ... .1198 ... Hall v. Trotter (Tex. Civ. App.) 870 Hamilton v. Joachim (Tex. Civ. App.).... 645 Hanlin v. Burk Bros. Meat & Provision Hanson v. Hodges (Ark.) ... 978 Farland's Adm'r (Ky.). Hardage v. Durrett (Ark.). Harlan v. Texas Fuel & Supply Co. (Tex. Hollrah, State ex rel. Hallway v. (Mo. Harlingen Land & Water Co. v. Houston 44 547 392 798 .1142 628 v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. Harris v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Harwell, Wells Fargo & Co. Exp. v. (Ark.) Hays v. Hot Springs Savings, Trust & Hayutin, Cole v. (Ark.). Hedrick v. Kahmann (Mo. App.). Helm v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. Hendricks, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Hickey v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. (Mo. Hickman v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 24 382 117 Civ. App.) Hill, Central Bank & Trust Co. of Houston Hill v. Neese (Tex. Civ. App.) Hines v. State (Ark.). Hirsch, Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.)... v. (Tex. Civ. Hodges, Hanson v. (Ark.). 990 Wm. Cameron & Co. 644 578 608 854 Illinois Cent. R. Co., Bauer v. (Ky.)..... 933 999 330 637 Imperial Rice Co., Standard Mill. Co. v. ..1198 945 .1158 Ingram v. Coleman (Ark.) .1190 International Molasses Co. v. Jones Bros. 418 & Co. (Ark.). 746 International Order of Twelve Knights & Daughters of Tabor v. Denman (Tex. Civ. App.) .1083 ...1099 ... 1155 26 426 327 792 .1187 .1037 840 879 174 854 120 594 435 628 .1107 606 607 111 426 647 300 .1197 .1132 894 209 458 134 608 953 196 383 174 Jackson, Hoskins v. (Ky.).. 271 James v. State (Ark.).. 274 .1090 Japhet v. Polemanakos (Tex. Civ. App.).. 416 926 Jenkins, Grainger v. (Ky.). 487 528 |
Get this book in print
0 Reviews Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified Write review |