Panama Canal Tolls |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 22
Page 33
17 , 1921 ) represents approximately $ 500,000,000 . This sum , however , does not represent the amount that would have been necessary to build a commercial canal , and is not the sum upon which the Government should expect a return .
17 , 1921 ) represents approximately $ 500,000,000 . This sum , however , does not represent the amount that would have been necessary to build a commercial canal , and is not the sum upon which the Government should expect a return .
Page 79
This , together with the more favorable propelling power deduction , reduced the United States net tonnage approximately 2,000 tons , or 34 percent , and the rate per Panama Canal net ton from 78.8 to 51.9 cents , a reduction of 27 ...
This , together with the more favorable propelling power deduction , reduced the United States net tonnage approximately 2,000 tons , or 34 percent , and the rate per Panama Canal net ton from 78.8 to 51.9 cents , a reduction of 27 ...
Page 80
In 1933 they were reconditioned to secure the exemption of 2,400 tons of additional cabins which with propelling power adjustment re- duced their tolls approximately $ 2,850 per transit and the rate paid to 67.2 cents per Panama Canal ...
In 1933 they were reconditioned to secure the exemption of 2,400 tons of additional cabins which with propelling power adjustment re- duced their tolls approximately $ 2,850 per transit and the rate paid to 67.2 cents per Panama Canal ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Letter President Roosevelt to Senator Clark with enclosures | 29 |
21 | 35 |
255 | 41 |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actual additional administration American amount annual appropriations approximately average ballast basis believe bill Canal authorities capital cargo carried cents CHAIRMAN charges collections committee companies CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consideration considered construction cost cubic deck deck loads desire determined dollars earnings effect equal exemption expenses fact feet figure fiscal fixed follows foreign further Government Governor hearings included increase interest investment June 30 laden legislation less LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limits Line Luckenbach matter measurement military million modifications necessary officials operating owners paid Panama Canal rules passenger percent ports present President proper proposed question Railroad rate of tolls reading reason recommended reduction referred represent result revenues Secretary secure Senator DUFFY SHEEDY shipowners ships SMITH space statement steamship structure submitted Suez tion Tolls Committee tonnage tons trade traffic transit United vessels